Wrong-Headed Arrows

This illusion takes the right of way with your perspective

MATTHEW PRITCHARD

Join Our Community of Science Lovers!

Now that you are fully stocked up on toilet paper, you must be wondering what to do with the cardboard tubes inside the rolls. This is your opportunity to put your hoarded supplies to good use by blowing the minds of your socially distanced friends and family. So grab some leftover toilet paper tubes, a pair of scissors and a mirror for an experiment that will change your perspective.

In the photograph, an arrow and its reflection point away from each other. Impossible, you say? The explanation goes back to the moment in which Kokichi Sugihara, a mathematical engineer at Meiji University in Japan, discovered what he thought was a bug in his software. After writing a computer program to produce 3-D models from architectural blueprints, Sugihara tested his software by feeding it impossible images: illusions such as the Penrose steps in M. C. Escher’s Ascending and Descending lithograph, which appear to go infinitely up and down. Sugihara reasonably assumed that his code would spit out an error when confronted with the impossible. Instead the program interpreted the illusions as possible objects that only looked impossible from a specific vantage point. That is when the mathematician became an illusionist.

Sugihara later incorporated mirrors into his illusory creations—for example, to make an object’s reflection seem incompatible with the original, such as with two arrows pointing in opposite directions. Matthew Pritchard, a British physicist and magician, recently developed the toilet-paper-roll variant of Sugihara’s arrow illusion that we feature here. To build your own version, all you need to do is cut the top of a cardboard tube in a simple pattern that makes it look like an arrow pointing to the same side no matter which way you turn it because of your perspective of the near edge versus the far edge of the tube.


On supporting science journalism

If you're enjoying this article, consider supporting our award-winning journalism by subscribing. By purchasing a subscription you are helping to ensure the future of impactful stories about the discoveries and ideas shaping our world today.


To take your handiwork to the next level, prepare a dozen or so cardboard tubes cut in the same way and arrange them around the edge of your Lazy Susan or glass-plate microwave turntable. As the plate rotates, the impossible arrows never do! You can find the construction steps in Pritchard’s finalist video from the 2019 Best Illusion of the Year Contest.

Susana Martinez-Conde is a professor of ophthalmology, neurology, and physiology and pharmacology at SUNY Downstate Health Sciences University in Brooklyn, N.Y. She is author of the Prisma Prize–winning Sleights of Mind, along with Stephen Macknik and Sandra Blakeslee, and of Champions of Illusion, along with Stephen Macknik.

More by Susana Martinez-Conde

Stephen Macknik is a professor of ophthalmology, neurology, and physiology and pharmacology at SUNY Downstate Health Sciences University in Brooklyn, N.Y. Along with Susana Martinez-Conde and Sandra Blakeslee, he is author of the Prisma Prize–winning Sleights of Mind. He is also author of Champions of Illusion, along with Susana Martinez-Conde. Follow Macknik on Twitter @stephen_macknik

More by Stephen Macknik
SA Mind Vol 31 Issue 4This article was published with the title “Wrong-Headed Arrows” in SA Mind Vol. 31 No. 4 (), p. 35
doi:10.1038/scientificamericanmind0720-35

It’s Time to Stand Up for Science

If you enjoyed this article, I’d like to ask for your support. Scientific American has served as an advocate for science and industry for 180 years, and right now may be the most critical moment in that two-century history.

I’ve been a Scientific American subscriber since I was 12 years old, and it helped shape the way I look at the world. SciAm always educates and delights me, and inspires a sense of awe for our vast, beautiful universe. I hope it does that for you, too.

If you subscribe to Scientific American, you help ensure that our coverage is centered on meaningful research and discovery; that we have the resources to report on the decisions that threaten labs across the U.S.; and that we support both budding and working scientists at a time when the value of science itself too often goes unrecognized.

In return, you get essential news, captivating podcasts, brilliant infographics, can't-miss newsletters, must-watch videos, challenging games, and the science world's best writing and reporting. You can even gift someone a subscription.

There has never been a more important time for us to stand up and show why science matters. I hope you’ll support us in that mission.

Thank you,

David M. Ewalt, Editor in Chief, Scientific American

Subscribe