X-Ray Method Could Improve Nuclear Screening

A rapid imaging technique adapted from medical applications shows promise in the detection of nuclear materials

Join Our Community of Science Lovers!

An imaging technique used in medicine could help detect hidden nuclear material, according to the results of a computer simulation reported this week in the Journal of Applied Physics. The work suggests a way to improve efforts to stem illegal transport of such items.

“The basic idea here is to use currently available technologies, spectral X-ray detectors, to get more use out of the information that is available,” says co-author Andrew Gilbert, a nuclear engineer at the University of Texas in Austin who conducted the research at Pacific Northwest National Laboratory (PNNL) in Richland, Washington.

The detectors commonly used at airports return only block images of objects, even those that comprise multiple layers of different materials. Such scanners only count the number of X-ray photons passing through the material, and do not register the changes in energy of the X-rays. Hence, an X-ray of a suitcase containing plutonium, lead and iron would return an image based on an average density that would not discriminate between the three materials.


On supporting science journalism

If you're enjoying this article, consider supporting our award-winning journalism by subscribing. By purchasing a subscription you are helping to ensure the future of impactful stories about the discoveries and ideas shaping our world today.


In contrast, spectral radiography relies on the detection of photons at multiple energy levels once they have travelled through a material. The spectral radiograph produced in Gilbert’s simulations would show different materials and highlight those with energy ranges specific to potentially hazardous objects.

Gilbert and his colleagues modelled a layered system of plutonium, steel and cotton, on the basis of some of the materials’ chemical and physical parameters, such as density. Then they simulated an X-ray passing through to produce a spectral radiograph of the layered materials. Using a form of Beer’s Law, an equation that describes the interaction of an X-ray beam with an object of known composition, they were able to both identify the materials and estimate their thicknesses. The next step, the researchers say, will be to test the technique in the real world.

If the results are borne out, they suggest a “quantum jump in the information that you can get out of X-ray radiography,” says Klaus Mayer, a chemist at the European Commission’s Joint Research Center in Karlsruhe, Germany.

Although the desire for such detailed data isn’t new, having the technology to actually capture it is, says Robert Runkle, a nuclear physicist at PNNL, who was not involved in the work. The physics principles demonstrated in the paper, he says, “actually support building the system.”

This article is reproduced with permission from the magazine Nature. The article was first published on April 18, 2014.  

Jessica Morrison is a graduate student in Civil Engineering and Geological Sciences at the University of Notre Dame. She will be interning at the Chicago Tribune this summer as a 2012 AAAS Mass Media Fellow. You can get a snapshot of her appreciation for communication, yoga, and uranium on Twitter (@ihearttheroad), G+, and at her blog I Heart the Road

More by Jessica Morrison

First published in 1869, Nature is the world's leading multidisciplinary science journal. Nature publishes the finest peer-reviewed research that drives ground-breaking discovery, and is read by thought-leaders and decision-makers around the world.

More by Nature magazine

It’s Time to Stand Up for Science

If you enjoyed this article, I’d like to ask for your support. Scientific American has served as an advocate for science and industry for 180 years, and right now may be the most critical moment in that two-century history.

I’ve been a Scientific American subscriber since I was 12 years old, and it helped shape the way I look at the world. SciAm always educates and delights me, and inspires a sense of awe for our vast, beautiful universe. I hope it does that for you, too.

If you subscribe to Scientific American, you help ensure that our coverage is centered on meaningful research and discovery; that we have the resources to report on the decisions that threaten labs across the U.S.; and that we support both budding and working scientists at a time when the value of science itself too often goes unrecognized.

In return, you get essential news, captivating podcasts, brilliant infographics, can't-miss newsletters, must-watch videos, challenging games, and the science world's best writing and reporting. You can even gift someone a subscription.

There has never been a more important time for us to stand up and show why science matters. I hope you’ll support us in that mission.

Thank you,

David M. Ewalt, Editor in Chief, Scientific American

Subscribe