New Issue: Orbital Catastrophe Ahead? Read Now

X-Ray Method Could Improve Nuclear Screening

A rapid imaging technique adapted from medical applications shows promise in the detection of nuclear materials

Join Our Community of Science Lovers!

An imaging technique used in medicine could help detect hidden nuclear material, according to the results of a computer simulation reported this week in the Journal of Applied Physics. The work suggests a way to improve efforts to stem illegal transport of such items.

“The basic idea here is to use currently available technologies, spectral X-ray detectors, to get more use out of the information that is available,” says co-author Andrew Gilbert, a nuclear engineer at the University of Texas in Austin who conducted the research at Pacific Northwest National Laboratory (PNNL) in Richland, Washington.

The detectors commonly used at airports return only block images of objects, even those that comprise multiple layers of different materials. Such scanners only count the number of X-ray photons passing through the material, and do not register the changes in energy of the X-rays. Hence, an X-ray of a suitcase containing plutonium, lead and iron would return an image based on an average density that would not discriminate between the three materials.


On supporting science journalism

If you're enjoying this article, consider supporting our award-winning journalism by subscribing. By purchasing a subscription you are helping to ensure the future of impactful stories about the discoveries and ideas shaping our world today.


In contrast, spectral radiography relies on the detection of photons at multiple energy levels once they have travelled through a material. The spectral radiograph produced in Gilbert’s simulations would show different materials and highlight those with energy ranges specific to potentially hazardous objects.

Gilbert and his colleagues modelled a layered system of plutonium, steel and cotton, on the basis of some of the materials’ chemical and physical parameters, such as density. Then they simulated an X-ray passing through to produce a spectral radiograph of the layered materials. Using a form of Beer’s Law, an equation that describes the interaction of an X-ray beam with an object of known composition, they were able to both identify the materials and estimate their thicknesses. The next step, the researchers say, will be to test the technique in the real world.

If the results are borne out, they suggest a “quantum jump in the information that you can get out of X-ray radiography,” says Klaus Mayer, a chemist at the European Commission’s Joint Research Center in Karlsruhe, Germany.

Although the desire for such detailed data isn’t new, having the technology to actually capture it is, says Robert Runkle, a nuclear physicist at PNNL, who was not involved in the work. The physics principles demonstrated in the paper, he says, “actually support building the system.”

This article is reproduced with permission from the magazine Nature. The article was first published on April 18, 2014.  

Jessica Morrison is a graduate student in Civil Engineering and Geological Sciences at the University of Notre Dame. She will be interning at the Chicago Tribune this summer as a 2012 AAAS Mass Media Fellow. You can get a snapshot of her appreciation for communication, yoga, and uranium on Twitter (@ihearttheroad), G+, and at her blog I Heart the Road

More by Jessica Morrison

First published in 1869, Nature is the world's leading multidisciplinary science journal. Nature publishes the finest peer-reviewed research that drives ground-breaking discovery, and is read by thought-leaders and decision-makers around the world.

More by Nature magazine

Subscribe to Support Independent Journalism

Great science journalism requires human expertise, time, effort and creativity. And it costs money. That’s why I and the journalists here at Scientific American hope you’ll join our community.

When you subscribe, you are supporting staff and freelance journalists who are passionate about telling science stories that are true, important and compelling. Our editors and reporters are often experts in their fields, which means they understand the nuances of big discoveries and can untangle the breakthroughs from the hype. With a subscription, you are also supporting rigorous fact-checking to ensure the words we publish are precise and accurate. And you’re supporting original illustrations, graphics and photos that bring you closer to an advanced laboratory, an ice sheet in Antarctica or a space mission in orbit. You’re helping us craft other types of high-quality journalism as well: Our newsletters are carefully written, edited and curated by staffers you have or will come to know and love. Our Science Quickly podcast is based on original reporting, collaboration with editors and scientists and exacting production.

Subscriptions keep this engine running so we can continue to deliver thoughtful, rigorous and independent science journalism to you. In an era of viral misinformation, this work is crucial. If you value what we do, I hope you’ll consider joining us as a subscriber

Thank you,

Jeanna Bryner, Editor in Chief, Scientific American

Subscribe