Xerox PARC Materials Scientists Print Two Thirds of a Battery in 1 Go

The method squeezes out multiple parts at once—like striped toothpaste from the tube

Join Our Community of Science Lovers!

Printing batteries is the future of sustainable energy, according to engineers at PARC, the renowned California-based research and development company owned by Xerox. They recently debuted a cost-saving manufacturing process that could someday squeeze out all the parts of a battery at once—like striped toothpaste from the tube.

Today building a battery requires multiple steps. First, two separate machines fabricate electrodes by spreading pastelike layers of energy-storing materials on sheets of metal. After those sheets are dried and compressed, they are cut to size and sandwiched around a plastic separator to prevent electrical shortages. Last, the battery is packaged in a nonconductive material and filled with a liquid electrolyte that can carry charge between the electrodes.

The new battery-printing method simplifies that process. In April at a Materials Research Society meeting in San Francisco, PARC's Corie Cobb presented nozzles and materials that would enable manufacturers to print two thirds of a battery in one go. The two-headed printing nozzle can simultaneously extrude a lithium-ion cathode and a polymer separator. For now, until Cobb figures out a combination of materials that will not commingle during printing, a technician must add a graphite anode manually. But when all three components can be printed at once, Cobb and her colleagues estimate the triple-stripe process could reduce manufacturing costs by 15 percent. Still, battery makers have already shown interest in the double-stripe version. The prototype batteries perform as well as batteries made with the conventional process and the same materials.


On supporting science journalism

If you're enjoying this article, consider supporting our award-winning journalism by subscribing. By purchasing a subscription you are helping to ensure the future of impactful stories about the discoveries and ideas shaping our world today.


Less expensive batteries are key to making more affordable electric vehicles and enabling electric utilities to purchase and store additional grid-stabilizing energy from variable wind and solar sources. In the long run, batteries could also be printed into custom shapes for new types of gadgets—instead of the rectangles and circles designers must work around today.

Katherine Bourzac is a journalist based in San Francisco, who covers environment, climate, chemistry, health and computing for Nature, Science News, and other publications.

More by Katherine Bourzac
Scientific American Magazine Vol 313 Issue 1This article was published with the title “Build-a-Battery” in Scientific American Magazine Vol. 313 No. 1 (), p. 25
doi:10.1038/scientificamerican0715-25

It’s Time to Stand Up for Science

If you enjoyed this article, I’d like to ask for your support. Scientific American has served as an advocate for science and industry for 180 years, and right now may be the most critical moment in that two-century history.

I’ve been a Scientific American subscriber since I was 12 years old, and it helped shape the way I look at the world. SciAm always educates and delights me, and inspires a sense of awe for our vast, beautiful universe. I hope it does that for you, too.

If you subscribe to Scientific American, you help ensure that our coverage is centered on meaningful research and discovery; that we have the resources to report on the decisions that threaten labs across the U.S.; and that we support both budding and working scientists at a time when the value of science itself too often goes unrecognized.

In return, you get essential news, captivating podcasts, brilliant infographics, can't-miss newsletters, must-watch videos, challenging games, and the science world's best writing and reporting. You can even gift someone a subscription.

There has never been a more important time for us to stand up and show why science matters. I hope you’ll support us in that mission.

Thank you,

David M. Ewalt, Editor in Chief, Scientific American

Subscribe