New Issue: Orbital Catastrophe Ahead? Read Now

Xerox PARC Materials Scientists Print Two Thirds of a Battery in 1 Go

The method squeezes out multiple parts at once—like striped toothpaste from the tube

Join Our Community of Science Lovers!

Printing batteries is the future of sustainable energy, according to engineers at PARC, the renowned California-based research and development company owned by Xerox. They recently debuted a cost-saving manufacturing process that could someday squeeze out all the parts of a battery at once—like striped toothpaste from the tube.

Today building a battery requires multiple steps. First, two separate machines fabricate electrodes by spreading pastelike layers of energy-storing materials on sheets of metal. After those sheets are dried and compressed, they are cut to size and sandwiched around a plastic separator to prevent electrical shortages. Last, the battery is packaged in a nonconductive material and filled with a liquid electrolyte that can carry charge between the electrodes.

The new battery-printing method simplifies that process. In April at a Materials Research Society meeting in San Francisco, PARC's Corie Cobb presented nozzles and materials that would enable manufacturers to print two thirds of a battery in one go. The two-headed printing nozzle can simultaneously extrude a lithium-ion cathode and a polymer separator. For now, until Cobb figures out a combination of materials that will not commingle during printing, a technician must add a graphite anode manually. But when all three components can be printed at once, Cobb and her colleagues estimate the triple-stripe process could reduce manufacturing costs by 15 percent. Still, battery makers have already shown interest in the double-stripe version. The prototype batteries perform as well as batteries made with the conventional process and the same materials.


On supporting science journalism

If you're enjoying this article, consider supporting our award-winning journalism by subscribing. By purchasing a subscription you are helping to ensure the future of impactful stories about the discoveries and ideas shaping our world today.


Less expensive batteries are key to making more affordable electric vehicles and enabling electric utilities to purchase and store additional grid-stabilizing energy from variable wind and solar sources. In the long run, batteries could also be printed into custom shapes for new types of gadgets—instead of the rectangles and circles designers must work around today.

Katherine Bourzac is a journalist based in San Francisco, who covers environment, climate, chemistry, health and computing for Nature, Science News, and other publications.

More by Katherine Bourzac
Scientific American Magazine Vol 313 Issue 1This article was published with the title “Build-a-Battery” in Scientific American Magazine Vol. 313 No. 1 (), p. 25
doi:10.1038/scientificamerican0715-25

Subscribe to Support Independent Journalism

Great science journalism requires human expertise, time, effort and creativity. And it costs money. That’s why I and the journalists here at Scientific American hope you’ll join our community.

When you subscribe, you are supporting staff and freelance journalists who are passionate about telling science stories that are true, important and compelling. Our editors and reporters are often experts in their fields, which means they understand the nuances of big discoveries and can untangle the breakthroughs from the hype. With a subscription, you are also supporting rigorous fact-checking to ensure the words we publish are precise and accurate. And you’re supporting original illustrations, graphics and photos that bring you closer to an advanced laboratory, an ice sheet in Antarctica or a space mission in orbit. You’re helping us craft other types of high-quality journalism as well: Our newsletters are carefully written, edited and curated by staffers you have or will come to know and love. Our Science Quickly podcast is based on original reporting, collaboration with editors and scientists and exacting production.

Subscriptions keep this engine running so we can continue to deliver thoughtful, rigorous and independent science journalism to you. In an era of viral misinformation, this work is crucial. If you value what we do, I hope you’ll consider joining us as a subscriber

Thank you,

Jeanna Bryner, Editor in Chief, Scientific American

Subscribe