New Issue: Orbital Catastrophe Ahead? Read Now

You Are What You Read

How you identify with a protagonist in a story influences your attitudes and beliefs

Join Our Community of Science Lovers!


On supporting science journalism

If you're enjoying this article, consider supporting our award-winning journalism by subscribing. By purchasing a subscription you are helping to ensure the future of impactful stories about the discoveries and ideas shaping our world today.


Reading a good book immerses you in a character's world—and may change your views, according to a recent study at Ohio State University. Psychologists Geoff Kaufman and Lisa Libby assigned 78 heterosexual males to read one of three stories, two about a homosexual protagonist and one about a heterosexual protagonist. Afterward, the readers reported having no trouble identifying with the straight character, but their ability to relate to the gay protagonist varied based on when they discovered his orientation. Those who read a story in which the character was introduced as gay in the first paragraph did not connect to the character as strongly as those who learned of the character's orientation near the story's end. Most important, the latter group—the men who identified most with the gay protagonist—relied less on stereotypes to describe the character and reported more positive attitudes toward homosexuality in general. “Readers can emerge from a reading experience seeing the world, other people and themselves quite differently,” Kaufman says. The findings remind readers to think critically about their reactions to characters and to be aware of the power of prose.

Daisy Yuhas is the former editor of Scientific American's Mind Matters. A freelance science journalist, Yuhas is author of the Kids Field Guide to Birds (Cool Springs Press, 2024).

More by Daisy Yuhas
SA Mind Vol 23 Issue 4This article was published with the title “You Are What You Read” in SA Mind Vol. 23 No. 4 (), p. 18
doi:10.1038/scientificamericanmind0912-18a

Subscribe to Support Independent Journalism

Great science journalism requires human expertise, time, effort and creativity. And it costs money. That’s why I and the journalists here at Scientific American hope you’ll join our community.

When you subscribe, you are supporting staff and freelance journalists who are passionate about telling science stories that are true, important and compelling. Our editors and reporters are often experts in their fields, which means they understand the nuances of big discoveries and can untangle the breakthroughs from the hype. With a subscription, you are also supporting rigorous fact-checking to ensure the words we publish are precise and accurate. And you’re supporting original illustrations, graphics and photos that bring you closer to an advanced laboratory, an ice sheet in Antarctica or a space mission in orbit. You’re helping us craft other types of high-quality journalism as well: Our newsletters are carefully written, edited and curated by staffers you have or will come to know and love. Our Science Quickly podcast is based on original reporting, collaboration with editors and scientists and exacting production.

Subscriptions keep this engine running so we can continue to deliver thoughtful, rigorous and independent science journalism to you. In an era of viral misinformation, this work is crucial. If you value what we do, I hope you’ll consider joining us as a subscriber

Thank you,

Jeanna Bryner, Editor in Chief, Scientific American

Subscribe