Young Mammal Hearts Heal Themselves

Organs in baby mice can recover from damage that occurs in the first week of life.

Join Our Community of Science Lovers!

By Janelle WEaver

Staying young at heart has taken on a new meaning. Newborn mice can mend their own hearts, thanks to the replication of healthy cardiac cells. The findings, published today in Science, reveal striking similarities in the way that fish and neonate mammals rejuvenate their organs.

Zebrafish (Danio rerio) can recover lost cardiac tissue throughout their life, even after a 20% amputation of the ventricle, in large part because of the proliferation of remaining heart muscle cells called cardiomyocytes. Similarly, mouse embryos with a genetic defect that harms the heart can restore cardiac cells through proliferation and regain normal function. Although adult mammals can replace some damaged cardiomyocytes, the turnover rate in humans is estimated to be lower than 1% a year -- not enough to revitalize the organ after a heart attack or other major injury that causes scar formation.


On supporting science journalism

If you're enjoying this article, consider supporting our award-winning journalism by subscribing. By purchasing a subscription you are helping to ensure the future of impactful stories about the discoveries and ideas shaping our world today.


Follow your heart

Hesham Sadek, a cardiologist of the University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center in Dallas and lead author of the new study1, suspected that there might be a crucial stage during mammalian development after which cardiomyocytes are no longer capable of repopulating and repairing the heart.

So, he and his team surgically removed about 15% of muscle tissue in the walls of the left ventricle of 1-day-old mice. One week later, they found molecular evidence for cardiomyocyte proliferation throughout the heart. The animals fully recovered muscle tissue within three weeks of the operation, and their left ventricle pumped blood normally within two months. The same procedure performed on 7-day-old mice did not lead to cardiomyocyte proliferation or regeneration.

The mice were genetically engineered to express a blue tint in their cardiomyocytes, so the researchers were able to determine whether cells from this lineage permeated the new tissue. They found that most of the new cardiomyocytes came from pre-existing cardiac cells rather than from stem cells, although they cannot completely rule out the role of stem cells in some types of cardiac repair.

Genetic off-switch

The study "narrows the window during which the transition is made from a regenerative heart to a non-regenerative structure", says Kenneth Poss, a cell biologist at Duke University in Durham, North Carolina. Guided by a specific time frame, scientists may find it easier to identify factors that allow the heart to heal, he says.

The authors speculate that, in the first week of life, a genetic program instructs the heart cells to stop dividing, but the loss of regeneration could also be affected by the disappearance of hormones or other environmental signals that trigger cell division during this time. The authors are now looking for genes, gene silencers and drugs that could extend the regenerative period and reawaken it in the adult heart, says Eric Olson, a co-author and molecular biologist at the University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center.

The results could be bad news for attempts to use stem cells to regenerate the heart, says Mark Keating, a cardiologist at the Novartis Institutes for BioMedical Research in Cambridge, Massachusetts. "This work doesn't prove that those efforts won't be successful, but it doesn't make it more encouraging, either," he says.

It’s Time to Stand Up for Science

If you enjoyed this article, I’d like to ask for your support. Scientific American has served as an advocate for science and industry for 180 years, and right now may be the most critical moment in that two-century history.

I’ve been a Scientific American subscriber since I was 12 years old, and it helped shape the way I look at the world. SciAm always educates and delights me, and inspires a sense of awe for our vast, beautiful universe. I hope it does that for you, too.

If you subscribe to Scientific American, you help ensure that our coverage is centered on meaningful research and discovery; that we have the resources to report on the decisions that threaten labs across the U.S.; and that we support both budding and working scientists at a time when the value of science itself too often goes unrecognized.

In return, you get essential news, captivating podcasts, brilliant infographics, can't-miss newsletters, must-watch videos, challenging games, and the science world's best writing and reporting. You can even gift someone a subscription.

There has never been a more important time for us to stand up and show why science matters. I hope you’ll support us in that mission.

Thank you,

David M. Ewalt, Editor in Chief, Scientific American

Subscribe