New Issue: Orbital Catastrophe Ahead? Read Now

Your Appendix Could Save Your Life

The humble organ may help us recover from serious infections

Join Our Community of Science Lovers!

You may have heard that the appendix is a relic of our past, like the hind leg bones of a whale. Bill Parker, a professor of surgery at the Duke University School of Medicine, heard that, too; he just disagrees. Parker thinks the appendix serves as a “nature reserve” for beneficial bacteria in our gut. When we get a severe gut infection such as cholera (which happened often during much of our history and is common in many regions even today), the bene­ficial bacteria in our gut are depleted. The appendix allows them to be re­stored. In essence, Parker sees the appendix as a sanctuary for our tiny mutualist friends, a place where there is always room at the inn.

Parker’s hypothesis, which he and collaborators first published in 2007 in the Journal of Theoretical Biology, is a fundamentally new idea about how an organ in our body works. A paper published last December provides new data to back up the theory.

James Grendell, chief of the division of gastroenterology, hepatology and nutrition at Winthrop University-Hospital on Long Island, and his team studied 254 patients with a history of gut infections caused by the bacterium Clostridium difficile. C. difficile, known as C. diff among the medical in-crowd, is a deadly pathogen often encountered in hospitals, particularly when patients must be treated by prolonged courses of antibiotics. C. diff does not appear to compete well with the native biota of patients’ guts, but when the native biota are depleted (as is the case after several courses of antibiotics), C. diff can grow quickly and take over. If Parker’s idea is right, individuals without an appendix should be more likely to have a recurrence of C. diff than those with one.


On supporting science journalism

If you're enjoying this article, consider supporting our award-winning journalism by subscribing. By purchasing a subscription you are helping to ensure the future of impactful stories about the discoveries and ideas shaping our world today.


And that is precisely what Grendell’s group found: patients without an appendix were more than twice as likely to have a recurrence of C. difficile. Recurrence in individuals with their appendix intact occurred in 18 percent of cases. Recurrence in those without their appendix occurred in 45 percent of cases.

Where does this leave us? In your body is an organ that appears to be helping out the bacteria in your life so they can, in turn, help keep you alive. More tests, even true experiments, need to be done before we can be sure. Until then, doctors will keep cutting out infected appendixes. When they do, when they hold them up, they hold up a symbol—a somewhat gross, pinky finger–size symbol—both of our complex relationship with other species and of how little we know.

This article was published in print as "Your Appendix Could Save Your Life."

Rob Dunn is a biologist at North Carolina State University and a writer whose articles have appeared in Natural History, Smithsonian and National Geographic, among other publications.

More by Rob Dunn
Scientific American Magazine Vol 306 Issue 3This article was published with the title “Your Appendix Could Save Your Life” in Scientific American Magazine Vol. 306 No. 3 ()
doi:10.1038/scientificamerican032012-5KffcWfpARF2CGtQNMAdxJ

Subscribe to Support Independent Journalism

Great science journalism requires human expertise, time, effort and creativity. And it costs money. That’s why I and the journalists here at Scientific American hope you’ll join our community.

When you subscribe, you are supporting staff and freelance journalists who are passionate about telling science stories that are true, important and compelling. Our editors and reporters are often experts in their fields, which means they understand the nuances of big discoveries and can untangle the breakthroughs from the hype. With a subscription, you are also supporting rigorous fact-checking to ensure the words we publish are precise and accurate. And you’re supporting original illustrations, graphics and photos that bring you closer to an advanced laboratory, an ice sheet in Antarctica or a space mission in orbit. You’re helping us craft other types of high-quality journalism as well: Our newsletters are carefully written, edited and curated by staffers you have or will come to know and love. Our Science Quickly podcast is based on original reporting, collaboration with editors and scientists and exacting production.

Subscriptions keep this engine running so we can continue to deliver thoughtful, rigorous and independent science journalism to you. In an era of viral misinformation, this work is crucial. If you value what we do, I hope you’ll consider joining us as a subscriber

Thank you,

Jeanna Bryner, Editor in Chief, Scientific American

Subscribe