A Political Submarine, 1916

Reported in Scientific American, this Week in World War I: July 22, 1916

Scientific American, July 22, 1916

Join Our Community of Science Lovers!

This article was published in Scientific American’s former blog network and reflects the views of the author, not necessarily those of Scientific American


When a submarine, an unarmed German civilian merchant cargo-carrying submarine, quietly steamed into Baltimore harbor, its arrival won a victory in the political and economic battle that was part of World War I.

During the war, trade with neutral nations, such as the United States, was completely legal for all belligerants. In practise, the British Royal Navy had imposed a blockade that prevented all trade, including food and medicine, from benefiting Germany and Austria-Hungary. The “Deutschland” carried a cargo of chemical dyes used by industry along with medical drugs, among other non-military goods, and sailed on behalf of a German business consortium. The accompanying article in Scientific American, today 100 years ago, said:

“A company was formed in Bremen and several large cargo-carrying U-boats were laid down. The first of these, the ‘Deutschland,’ left Bremen with a cargo of dyestuffs and chemicals on June 14th [1916], and shaped her course for Heligoland. There, she remained for nine days, for the purpose, so her captain stated, of throwing the enemy off the scent, if, by any means, he should have learned of what was being attempted. ‘Deutschland’ was manned by a crew of eight officers and twenty-one men. She was under the command of Captain Koenig.”  


On supporting science journalism

If you're enjoying this article, consider supporting our award-winning journalism by subscribing. By purchasing a subscription you are helping to ensure the future of impactful stories about the discoveries and ideas shaping our world today.


The submarine “Deutschland” and a harbor tug, showing the radio masts up and giving a good indication of the unusual bulkiness of the merchant submarine. Credit: Scientific American, July 22, 1916

The cargo was less important than the fact that the arrival of the submarine had outwitted the British intent to strangle their enemies economically. The Allies protested that an unarmed submarine could not really qualify as a merchant vessel and had to be treated like a ship of war. The United States, sensitive to the fact that the Royal Navy was preventing all trade with the central powers, held to the position that an unarmed vessel was a merchant vessel. The return cargo consisted largely of raw materials such as nickel and rubber—not weapons, but material that was very useful for military goods. The amount of cargo was tiny, compared with the actual political value of the propaganda victory of having successfully outwitted, if only temporarily, the intent of the Allied blockade while simultaneously reminding the United States that Germany had long historical ties and could be a friend and trading partner.

The submarine made only one more journey as a merchant trader. As relations between Germany and the United States deteriorated, the boat was requisitioned by the German Navy and armed with torpedo tubes and deck guns.

Sea Dog: Captain Paul Koenig of the cargo submarine “Deutschland.” He became a minor celebrity in the United States and was therefore highly useful for propaganda purposes. Credit: Scientific American, July 22, 1916

Dan Schlenoff was a contributing editor at Scientific American and edited the 50, 100 and 150 Years Ago column for one seventh of the magazine's history.

More by Dan Schlenoff

It’s Time to Stand Up for Science

If you enjoyed this article, I’d like to ask for your support. Scientific American has served as an advocate for science and industry for 180 years, and right now may be the most critical moment in that two-century history.

I’ve been a Scientific American subscriber since I was 12 years old, and it helped shape the way I look at the world. SciAm always educates and delights me, and inspires a sense of awe for our vast, beautiful universe. I hope it does that for you, too.

If you subscribe to Scientific American, you help ensure that our coverage is centered on meaningful research and discovery; that we have the resources to report on the decisions that threaten labs across the U.S.; and that we support both budding and working scientists at a time when the value of science itself too often goes unrecognized.

In return, you get essential news, captivating podcasts, brilliant infographics, can't-miss newsletters, must-watch videos, challenging games, and the science world's best writing and reporting. You can even gift someone a subscription.

There has never been a more important time for us to stand up and show why science matters. I hope you’ll support us in that mission.

Thank you,

David M. Ewalt, Editor in Chief, Scientific American

Subscribe