Aircraft Communication, 1915

Join Our Community of Science Lovers!

This article was published in Scientific American’s former blog network and reflects the views of the author, not necessarily those of Scientific American


Reported in Scientific American, this Week in World War I: September 25, 1915

Considering how flying, even in the earliest years of the era of flight, seems high-tech, and despite the fact that the first trans-Atlantic wireless message was sent in 1901, it is curious to see flying machines in 1915 having to rely on communication technology that seems not too far advanced from smoke signals. Our article from this week 100 years ago says:

“In considering means of signaling from airships one's first thought would be to turn to wireless telegraphy, but on account of the many troubles experienced with same, it became necessary to search for some other and more practical means for communication with the observation stations.”


On supporting science journalism

If you're enjoying this article, consider supporting our award-winning journalism by subscribing. By purchasing a subscription you are helping to ensure the future of impactful stories about the discoveries and ideas shaping our world today.


One of the most useful roles for aircraft and airships in the First World War was for reconnaissance. It was all very well to record information while flying, then wait to land to make a report, but it was more useful to be able to give instantaneous reports while still in the air over the target. But the first wireless sets for installation in aircraft, developed by the middle of 1915, were heavy, had a short range and were fragile—not useful traits for military aircraft then or now.

The French devised a stop-gap system using a 5-gallon cylinder filled with lamp black (a very finely powdered black substance). The container could puff out small clouds of lamp black in a Morse code pattern. Range was limited, it could only be used in daylight, and of course the pilot could not receive replies [see top image].

The Germans “did not adopt this method, but are using a more practical system invented by the German scientist, Donath.” For signaling from airships, a lamp attached to batteries could flash out Morse code messages by day or night. “The efficiency was tested on the Johannis-Thaal aviation grounds, and it was found that at night signals could be sent a distance of 10 miles, and in the brightest daylight signals could be distinguished over five miles.”

A German system for use by airplane and Zeppelin crews for signalling: a lamp that could flash Morse code messages. 
Image: Scientific American, September 25, 1915 

By 1916 more robust and lighter wireless sets for aircraft were being produced by all sides in the conflict, and these stopgap measures were obsolete.

Our full archive of the war, called Scientific American Chronicles: World War I, has many articles from 1914–1918 on the trench war on the Western Front. It is available for purchase at www.scientificamerican.com/products/world-war-i/

It’s Time to Stand Up for Science

If you enjoyed this article, I’d like to ask for your support. Scientific American has served as an advocate for science and industry for 180 years, and right now may be the most critical moment in that two-century history.

I’ve been a Scientific American subscriber since I was 12 years old, and it helped shape the way I look at the world. SciAm always educates and delights me, and inspires a sense of awe for our vast, beautiful universe. I hope it does that for you, too.

If you subscribe to Scientific American, you help ensure that our coverage is centered on meaningful research and discovery; that we have the resources to report on the decisions that threaten labs across the U.S.; and that we support both budding and working scientists at a time when the value of science itself too often goes unrecognized.

In return, you get essential news, captivating podcasts, brilliant infographics, can't-miss newsletters, must-watch videos, challenging games, and the science world's best writing and reporting. You can even gift someone a subscription.

There has never been a more important time for us to stand up and show why science matters. I hope you’ll support us in that mission.

Thank you,

David M. Ewalt, Editor in Chief, Scientific American

Subscribe