Aircraft Communication, 1915

Join Our Community of Science Lovers!

This article was published in Scientific American’s former blog network and reflects the views of the author, not necessarily those of Scientific American


Reported in Scientific American, this Week in World War I: September 25, 1915

Considering how flying, even in the earliest years of the era of flight, seems high-tech, and despite the fact that the first trans-Atlantic wireless message was sent in 1901, it is curious to see flying machines in 1915 having to rely on communication technology that seems not too far advanced from smoke signals. Our article from this week 100 years ago says:

“In considering means of signaling from airships one's first thought would be to turn to wireless telegraphy, but on account of the many troubles experienced with same, it became necessary to search for some other and more practical means for communication with the observation stations.”


On supporting science journalism

If you're enjoying this article, consider supporting our award-winning journalism by subscribing. By purchasing a subscription you are helping to ensure the future of impactful stories about the discoveries and ideas shaping our world today.


One of the most useful roles for aircraft and airships in the First World War was for reconnaissance. It was all very well to record information while flying, then wait to land to make a report, but it was more useful to be able to give instantaneous reports while still in the air over the target. But the first wireless sets for installation in aircraft, developed by the middle of 1915, were heavy, had a short range and were fragile—not useful traits for military aircraft then or now.

The French devised a stop-gap system using a 5-gallon cylinder filled with lamp black (a very finely powdered black substance). The container could puff out small clouds of lamp black in a Morse code pattern. Range was limited, it could only be used in daylight, and of course the pilot could not receive replies [see top image].

The Germans “did not adopt this method, but are using a more practical system invented by the German scientist, Donath.” For signaling from airships, a lamp attached to batteries could flash out Morse code messages by day or night. “The efficiency was tested on the Johannis-Thaal aviation grounds, and it was found that at night signals could be sent a distance of 10 miles, and in the brightest daylight signals could be distinguished over five miles.”

A German system for use by airplane and Zeppelin crews for signalling: a lamp that could flash Morse code messages. 
Image: Scientific American, September 25, 1915 

By 1916 more robust and lighter wireless sets for aircraft were being produced by all sides in the conflict, and these stopgap measures were obsolete.

Our full archive of the war, called Scientific American Chronicles: World War I, has many articles from 1914–1918 on the trench war on the Western Front. It is available for purchase at www.scientificamerican.com/products/world-war-i/

Subscribe to Support Independent Journalism

Great science journalism requires human expertise, time, effort and creativity. And it costs money. That’s why I and the journalists here at Scientific American hope you’ll join our community.

When you subscribe, you are supporting staff and freelance journalists who are passionate about telling science stories that are true, important and compelling. Our editors and reporters are often experts in their fields, which means they understand the nuances of big discoveries and can untangle the breakthroughs from the hype. With a subscription, you are also supporting rigorous fact-checking to ensure the words we publish are precise and accurate. And you’re supporting original illustrations, graphics and photos that bring you closer to an advanced laboratory, an ice sheet in Antarctica or a space mission in orbit. You’re helping us craft other types of high-quality journalism as well: Our newsletters are carefully written, edited and curated by staffers you have or will come to know and love. Our Science Quickly podcast is based on original reporting, collaboration with editors and scientists and exacting production.

Subscriptions keep this engine running so we can continue to deliver thoughtful, rigorous and independent science journalism to you. In an era of viral misinformation, this work is crucial. If you value what we do, I hope you’ll consider joining us as a subscriber

Thank you,

Jeanna Bryner, Editor in Chief, Scientific American

Subscribe