Anecdotes from the Archive: A ship-shooting formula

Join Our Community of Science Lovers!

This article was published in Scientific American’s former blog network and reflects the views of the author, not necessarily those of Scientific American


One of the reasons I dreaded math class was the looming feeling that what I learned would turn out to be useless. No matter how hard I tried, I could not imagine a situation outside of school when I would need to know how to graph a logarithm or find the degree of an unknown angle. If only I had taken a trip to the garrison of Gibraltar in the early 19th-century, I might have thought otherwise.

Alexander Alcock wrote into Scientific American about the use of geometry and trigonometry in measuring inaccessible distances, and was featured in the March 25, 1854 issue. Alcock explained that he devised the method some 25 years prior when he was quartered in a garrison at Gibraltar, where there were several batteries at different heights above sea level.


On supporting science journalism

If you're enjoying this article, consider supporting our award-winning journalism by subscribing. By purchasing a subscription you are helping to ensure the future of impactful stories about the discoveries and ideas shaping our world today.


Following are the directions as quoted in the magazine, as I do not trust myself to paraphrase math formulas. For clarification, A is at the bottom left of the etching, B is at the cannon, C the ship at the bottom right, and D is at the top right:

"Let B be the position of a gun on an eminence, whose hight [sic] BA above the level of the sea is known, C the position of a ship or other object on the horizontal plane; suppose BD to be drawn parallel to AC. Lay the gun by the line of metal for the object at C, and with a quadrant determine the angle of depression DBC, which will be the measure of BCA, the alternate angle. Now in the right-angle triangle ABC, we have three quantities given to find all the rest. Then as the sine of ACB is to AB, so is radius to BC the inaccessible distance. Thus we obtain a common formula, namely, that the hight of the piece above the horizontal plane divided by the sine of the angle of depression will in all cases give the distance of the inaccessible object from the gun."

Alcock then created a table encompassing the different battery levels. Using these formulas, he made it easy for others to find the distance to the target once they figured out the angle of depression between the position of the gun and the height above sea level. So thanks to Mr. Alcock, I stand corrected. Math can be very useful…especially when there is a cannon involved.

 

About the Author: Mary Karmelek is a production assistant for Nature Publishing Group and is currently working on Scientific American's Digital Archive Project, where she spends countless hours scouring articles and ads of decades long ago. She graduated with her MA in English from Fordham University in 2010 and currently resides in New York City. Whereas her educational background is in gender and war trauma in modernist literature, Mary also has a keen interest in the historical and visual documentation of science, nature and medicine.

In 1845 Scientific American magazine made its debut on newsstands and has continued to be published ever since. Now, Nature Publishing Group and Scientific American are working to digitize all past issues of the magazine. Mary Karmelek is in charge of checking over each issue, and in the process she uncovers fascinating, captivating and humorous material buried in the yellowed pages of our past. In this blog she shares the highlights of her discoveries. Additional archival material appears every month in our 50, 100 and 150 Years Ago column.

More by Mary Karmelek

It’s Time to Stand Up for Science

If you enjoyed this article, I’d like to ask for your support. Scientific American has served as an advocate for science and industry for 180 years, and right now may be the most critical moment in that two-century history.

I’ve been a Scientific American subscriber since I was 12 years old, and it helped shape the way I look at the world. SciAm always educates and delights me, and inspires a sense of awe for our vast, beautiful universe. I hope it does that for you, too.

If you subscribe to Scientific American, you help ensure that our coverage is centered on meaningful research and discovery; that we have the resources to report on the decisions that threaten labs across the U.S.; and that we support both budding and working scientists at a time when the value of science itself too often goes unrecognized.

In return, you get essential news, captivating podcasts, brilliant infographics, can't-miss newsletters, must-watch videos, challenging games, and the science world's best writing and reporting. You can even gift someone a subscription.

There has never been a more important time for us to stand up and show why science matters. I hope you’ll support us in that mission.

Thank you,

David M. Ewalt, Editor in Chief, Scientific American

Subscribe