Anecdotes from the Archive: The key to sorting mail

Join Our Community of Science Lovers!

This article was published in Scientific American’s former blog network and reflects the views of the author, not necessarily those of Scientific American


A certain children’s show I grew up watching had an episode featuring the post office. The host of the show got a behind-the-scenes look at what happened to all the mail once it had been delivered to the post office, and I was immediately fascinated by the immensity of letters and their ability to find the right conveyor belt in the labyrinth of machinery behind the service desks and P.O. boxes. As I came across this article from May 19th, 1917 depicting one method of sorting mail—a handy operator and a keyboard machine—my interest peaked once again.


The machine, first used in the Chicago post office, consisted of a keyboard and "carriers" attached to a conveyor belt that passed over different compartments. While the operator sat at the keyboard, the letters passed in front of him one at a time. After quickly looking at the letter, he struck a key that corresponded to the address, and the machine ushered the letter into a carrier. Each carrier had a row of triggers on its bottom that would correspond to triggers at the top of a certain compartment.


On supporting science journalism

If you're enjoying this article, consider supporting our award-winning journalism by subscribing. By purchasing a subscription you are helping to ensure the future of impactful stories about the discoveries and ideas shaping our world today.


"Once inserted in its carrier and the triggers on the latter properly set, the letter proceeds by jerks as each subsequent key is struck. It passes without recognition all the wrong compartments; but as it reaches the right one, for which the triggers holding it in place are set, it is released by the tripping of those triggers, and falls out and down into the compartment."

Pretty cool. I admit, I’m not up-to-date on how the post offices sort mail now, but I assume it’s something similar to this—minus the human element. Does anyone know how it’s progressed?

 

About the Author: Mary Karmelek is a production assistant for Nature Publishing Group and is currently working on Scientific American's Digital Archive Project, where she spends countless hours scouring articles and ads of decades long ago. She graduated with her MA in English from Fordham University in 2010 and currently resides in New York City. While her educational background is in gender and war trauma in modernist literature, Mary also has a keen interest in the historical and visual documentation of science, nature and medicine.

In 1845 Scientific American magazine made its debut on newsstands and has continued to be published ever since. Now, Nature Publishing Group and Scientific American are working to digitize all past issues of the magazine. Mary Karmelek is in charge of checking over each issue, and in the process she uncovers fascinating, captivating and humorous material buried in the yellowed pages of our past. In this blog she shares the highlights of her discoveries. Additional archival material appears every month in our 50, 100 and 150 Years Ago column.

More by Mary Karmelek

It’s Time to Stand Up for Science

If you enjoyed this article, I’d like to ask for your support. Scientific American has served as an advocate for science and industry for 180 years, and right now may be the most critical moment in that two-century history.

I’ve been a Scientific American subscriber since I was 12 years old, and it helped shape the way I look at the world. SciAm always educates and delights me, and inspires a sense of awe for our vast, beautiful universe. I hope it does that for you, too.

If you subscribe to Scientific American, you help ensure that our coverage is centered on meaningful research and discovery; that we have the resources to report on the decisions that threaten labs across the U.S.; and that we support both budding and working scientists at a time when the value of science itself too often goes unrecognized.

In return, you get essential news, captivating podcasts, brilliant infographics, can't-miss newsletters, must-watch videos, challenging games, and the science world's best writing and reporting. You can even gift someone a subscription.

There has never been a more important time for us to stand up and show why science matters. I hope you’ll support us in that mission.

Thank you,

David M. Ewalt, Editor in Chief, Scientific American

Subscribe