Conveying a solution to mass transit

Join Our Community of Science Lovers!

This article was published in Scientific American’s former blog network and reflects the views of the author, not necessarily those of Scientific American


I’m sure you’ve all been to an airport and seen the moving walkways that look like flattened escalators. Some people take them as an excuse to not walk whereas others use them as an opportunity to speed up their walking time. Now, imagine this same concept in transportation perched a story off the ground on a busy city street, conveying pedestrians back and forth through the metropolis.

Scientific American featured a design of this nature by Alfred Speer of Passaic, New Jersey, in the April 20, 1872, issue called the “Endless Traveling" or "Railway Sidewalk.” The rail could have been used in any crowded city, but Speer envisioned it to be used in New York City on a busy thoroughfare like Broadway.


On supporting science journalism

If you're enjoying this article, consider supporting our award-winning journalism by subscribing. By purchasing a subscription you are helping to ensure the future of impactful stories about the discoveries and ideas shaping our world today.


The movement of the sidewalk was produced by underground engines below ground. The sidewalk was to be held up by ornamental iron pillars (five to six per block) placed along its outer edge. This would help hide the motion of the rails from horses on the ground who may have otherwise been scared of the movement.

The elevated sidewalk itself was to be 16 to 18 feet wide and placed 12 feet away from the sides of buildings along the street. The owners could then choose to place a walkway from the first floor of their buildings to the sidewalk, driving more traffic into their ground floors. Otherwise, travelers were able to climb up to the sidewalk via stairs placed at street corners.

Pedestrians were able to get on and off the perpetually moving elevated sidewalk without interfering with the travel of fellow passengers. The sidewalk moved at a rate of 10 mph or faster, increasing the speed of the average pedestrian who, according to the article, walked at four mph.  For those not wishing to walk, the sidewalk also offered chairs or settees for passengers.

Figures 2 and 3 show the design of the moving sidewalk. B is a stationary rail while the rail at A moves at the same speed as the moveable sidewalk. Seats have two sets of wheels, one on the stationary rail and one on the moving rail.

“It is evident that should the wheels on the fixed rail be kept from moving, while the others are left free to rotate, the transfer seats will stand still. When so standing, passengers may step with perfect safety from the fixed platform into the moving seat. Now, if the wheels on the fixed rail be released, and those on the moving rail be kept from turning, the friction of the moving rail, on the wheels so held, will soon impart an advancing motion to the car or seat equal to the moving walk, at which time the passengers may step from the seat to the moving walk as safely as they stepped upon the platform of the seat.”

Mr. Speer believed that because of the perpetual motion of the platform, problems of overcrowding that existed in railway cars could be avoided. However, the project never got enough financial backing to get off the ground (pun intended).

In 1845 Scientific American magazine made its debut on newsstands and has continued to be published ever since. Now, Nature Publishing Group and Scientific American are working to digitize all past issues of the magazine. Mary Karmelek is in charge of checking over each issue, and in the process she uncovers fascinating, captivating and humorous material buried in the yellowed pages of our past. In this blog she shares the highlights of her discoveries. Additional archival material appears every month in our 50, 100 and 150 Years Ago column.

More by Mary Karmelek

It’s Time to Stand Up for Science

If you enjoyed this article, I’d like to ask for your support. Scientific American has served as an advocate for science and industry for 180 years, and right now may be the most critical moment in that two-century history.

I’ve been a Scientific American subscriber since I was 12 years old, and it helped shape the way I look at the world. SciAm always educates and delights me, and inspires a sense of awe for our vast, beautiful universe. I hope it does that for you, too.

If you subscribe to Scientific American, you help ensure that our coverage is centered on meaningful research and discovery; that we have the resources to report on the decisions that threaten labs across the U.S.; and that we support both budding and working scientists at a time when the value of science itself too often goes unrecognized.

In return, you get essential news, captivating podcasts, brilliant infographics, can't-miss newsletters, must-watch videos, challenging games, and the science world's best writing and reporting. You can even gift someone a subscription.

There has never been a more important time for us to stand up and show why science matters. I hope you’ll support us in that mission.

Thank you,

David M. Ewalt, Editor in Chief, Scientific American

Subscribe