Fate of Torpedoed Ships, 1915

Join Our Community of Science Lovers!

This article was published in Scientific American’s former blog network and reflects the views of the author, not necessarily those of Scientific American


Reported in Scientific American, this Week in World War I: October 9, 1915

The first American ship to be torpedoed in World War I, on May 1, 1915, while the United States was still a neutral country in the War, caused an immediate diplomatic outcry and stern warnings to the German government. The other part of the story, reported in the issue of October 9, 1915, was the fate of the ship itself:

“While the incident will perhaps be longer remembered for its serious effect on the then already strained diplomatic relations between the United States and Germany, still the successful repairing of a frail steamer, shattered by a torpedo capable of destroying the mightiest dreadnought [large battleship], is none the less noteworthy.”


On supporting science journalism

If you're enjoying this article, consider supporting our award-winning journalism by subscribing. By purchasing a subscription you are helping to ensure the future of impactful stories about the discoveries and ideas shaping our world today.


The S. S. Gulflight was an oil tanker, 5,189 gross register tons, owned by the Gulf Refining Company, on her way to Rouen, France, stuffed to the gills with lubricating oil and gasoline. Although hit by a single torpedo, the cargo (somewhat miraculously) failed to ignite, and the vessel, although it was badly holed enough that the crew abandoned ship, did not sink. Three Americans lost their lives (one due to a heart attack). The repairs took five months:

“The damage sustained by the ‘Gulflight’ consisted, in the main, of a huge, ragged hole on one side of the hull and a number of smaller holes; the latter being caused by the flying fragments of metal wrenched out of place and flung through the air, piercing the steel plates on the other side. The nature of the holes was such that a large section on both sides of the hull had to be removed. At one time during the work the bow portion of the vessel was almost disconnected entirely from the after portion, only a few beams of the skeleton holding them together.”

The ship, repaired, resumed a regular and less-dramatic role of shipping cargoes of oil and gasoline to the hard-pressed Allies for the rest of the war. Reprising the same role in World War II, the ship was not so lucky, being sunk by a German torpedo in 1942.

Repairing the tanker S.S. Gulflight while in drydock: large steel plates and girders being rivetted in place within the hull.
Image: Scientific American Supplement, October 28, 1916

Our full archive of the war, called Scientific American Chronicles: World War I, has many articles from 1914–1918 on shipping and the naval battles of the First World War. It is available for purchase at www.scientificamerican.com/products/world-war-i/

It’s Time to Stand Up for Science

If you enjoyed this article, I’d like to ask for your support. Scientific American has served as an advocate for science and industry for 180 years, and right now may be the most critical moment in that two-century history.

I’ve been a Scientific American subscriber since I was 12 years old, and it helped shape the way I look at the world. SciAm always educates and delights me, and inspires a sense of awe for our vast, beautiful universe. I hope it does that for you, too.

If you subscribe to Scientific American, you help ensure that our coverage is centered on meaningful research and discovery; that we have the resources to report on the decisions that threaten labs across the U.S.; and that we support both budding and working scientists at a time when the value of science itself too often goes unrecognized.

In return, you get essential news, captivating podcasts, brilliant infographics, can't-miss newsletters, must-watch videos, challenging games, and the science world's best writing and reporting. You can even gift someone a subscription.

There has never been a more important time for us to stand up and show why science matters. I hope you’ll support us in that mission.

Thank you,

David M. Ewalt, Editor in Chief, Scientific American

Subscribe