Heavy traffic calls for "super-streets"

Join Our Community of Science Lovers!

This article was published in Scientific American’s former blog network and reflects the views of the author, not necessarily those of Scientific American


If you’ve ever commuted through New York City during rush hour, you’ve probably experienced stress-inducing traffic, over-stuffed subway cars, or delays that don’t care if you’ve given yourself an extra half hour. In 1924 the New York metropolitan area’s population was already large enough to get the Transit Commission thinking of ways to accommodate future traffic needs.

The September 1924 issue of Scientific American reported that the New York City Transit Commission and its Consulting Engineer, Daniel L. Turner, had devised a plan to deal with the estimated increase in future suburban traffic. The plan included the creation of 120-foot-wide “super-streets” and subway lines that would serve an area extending 40 miles outside of Manhattan.


On supporting science journalism

If you're enjoying this article, consider supporting our award-winning journalism by subscribing. By purchasing a subscription you are helping to ensure the future of impactful stories about the discoveries and ideas shaping our world today.


 The new system was to consist of three lines:

“The first will run from Jamaica to the Battery; up the west side of Manhattan to a new super-street built between Ninth and Tenth Avenues to 59th Street; and then below the East River to Long Island. The second, a Westchester-New Jersey line, will extend from 149th Street, in the Bronx, under a new super-street between Third and Second Avenues to 58th Street; thence with two branches, one down the Bowery and under the Hudson Rive to Johnston Avenue, New Jersey, to return to Manhattan at 59th Street; the other proceeding across 58th Street to a new super-street between Ninth and Tenth Avenues and thence south as shown on the map. The third will be a New Jersey line, routing from the West Side and Sip Avenues, Jersey City, south under the hill and Johnston Avenue; under the Hudson to the Bowery, and north by the Westchester and New Jersey line to 57th Street, thence west under the Hudson to Weehawken and thence south as shown.”

I wonder what Daniel L. Turner would think about the Metropolitan Transit Authority if he were alive to see its various trains, buses, and subways in action…and its sometimes disgruntled riders.

In 1845 Scientific American magazine made its debut on newsstands and has continued to be published ever since. Now, Nature Publishing Group and Scientific American are working to digitize all past issues of the magazine. Mary Karmelek is in charge of checking over each issue, and in the process she uncovers fascinating, captivating and humorous material buried in the yellowed pages of our past. In this blog she shares the highlights of her discoveries. Additional archival material appears every month in our 50, 100 and 150 Years Ago column.

More by Mary Karmelek

It’s Time to Stand Up for Science

If you enjoyed this article, I’d like to ask for your support. Scientific American has served as an advocate for science and industry for 180 years, and right now may be the most critical moment in that two-century history.

I’ve been a Scientific American subscriber since I was 12 years old, and it helped shape the way I look at the world. SciAm always educates and delights me, and inspires a sense of awe for our vast, beautiful universe. I hope it does that for you, too.

If you subscribe to Scientific American, you help ensure that our coverage is centered on meaningful research and discovery; that we have the resources to report on the decisions that threaten labs across the U.S.; and that we support both budding and working scientists at a time when the value of science itself too often goes unrecognized.

In return, you get essential news, captivating podcasts, brilliant infographics, can't-miss newsletters, must-watch videos, challenging games, and the science world's best writing and reporting. You can even gift someone a subscription.

There has never been a more important time for us to stand up and show why science matters. I hope you’ll support us in that mission.

Thank you,

David M. Ewalt, Editor in Chief, Scientific American

Subscribe