Supplies, Railways, Coal: The Struggle for Victory, 1916

Reported in Scientific American, this Week in World War I: July 29, 1916

Giant derrick swings a railway car full of coal over the hatchway of a hold of a cargo ship. The fuel was critical for powering transport for war material and for factories producing it.

Image: Scientific American Supplement, July 29, 1916

Join Our Community of Science Lovers!

This article was published in Scientific American’s former blog network and reflects the views of the author, not necessarily those of Scientific American


In the second year of the Great War production capacity was strained to the limit to produce enough food war materièl to supply the vast armies locked in the struggle for survival on the continent of Europe. In the Scientific American Supplement 100 years ago today, an article borrowed from the Railway Age Gazette spoke of this enormous task:

“Feeding the Firing Line”
By Walter S. Hiatt
As much science is employed in putting food into a soldier's mouth as in putting bullets into his opponent's skin. There is more method in supplying food to cavalry and wagon horses, gasoline to army automobiles, shells to cannon, medical supplies to hospitals or material to tbe engineering corps, than there is madness in the war itself.

The task of carrying supplies to an army of 4,000,000 men, concentrated, as in France, on a line 600 miles long by 20 deep is one of the most complicated of the war. It does not hegin to give a conception of the vast transportation problems involved to say that daily 25,000 tons of rations must be forwarded to the soldiers, that 1,000,000 quarts—a veritable river— of wine must reach them, that 75 tons of lead must be shipped for each German killed or wounded, or that the cost of the war material forwarded each day is $10,000,000 [$220,000,000 in 2016 dollars]. One railroad alone furnishes more than 3,500 cars a day for army transportation purposes; 100,000 automobiles and 600,000 wagons are required to distribute the shipments at the front.”


On supporting science journalism

If you're enjoying this article, consider supporting our award-winning journalism by subscribing. By purchasing a subscription you are helping to ensure the future of impactful stories about the discoveries and ideas shaping our world today.


Coal, its extraction and shipment, was integral to the ability of railways to move, and factories to produce ammunition. On the cover of the same issue, a photograph shows a method of moving coal more efficiently on the docks in England: an entire railway car full of the stuff is carried aloft and the contents dumped into the cargo hold of a waiting ship for export, probably to France.

It’s Time to Stand Up for Science

If you enjoyed this article, I’d like to ask for your support. Scientific American has served as an advocate for science and industry for 180 years, and right now may be the most critical moment in that two-century history.

I’ve been a Scientific American subscriber since I was 12 years old, and it helped shape the way I look at the world. SciAm always educates and delights me, and inspires a sense of awe for our vast, beautiful universe. I hope it does that for you, too.

If you subscribe to Scientific American, you help ensure that our coverage is centered on meaningful research and discovery; that we have the resources to report on the decisions that threaten labs across the U.S.; and that we support both budding and working scientists at a time when the value of science itself too often goes unrecognized.

In return, you get essential news, captivating podcasts, brilliant infographics, can't-miss newsletters, must-watch videos, challenging games, and the science world's best writing and reporting. You can even gift someone a subscription.

There has never been a more important time for us to stand up and show why science matters. I hope you’ll support us in that mission.

Thank you,

David M. Ewalt, Editor in Chief, Scientific American

Subscribe