Techniques for Trench Warfare, 1916

Reported in Scientific American, this Week in World War I: May 6, 1916.

Join Our Community of Science Lovers!

This article was published in Scientific American’s former blog network and reflects the views of the author, not necessarily those of Scientific American


Static trench warfare developed in response to the perils of artillery and the power of rifles and machine guns. Despite the volume of industrial production devoted to manufacturing lethal weaponry, deeply-dug trenches in quiet sectors were not necessarily dangerous.

As long as the soldiers manning them were wary.

A watchful eye ensured that opposing troops were not sneaking in to attack; a patient rifleman could hinder the enemy’s ability to maneuver, attack or build defenses. Troops devised or adopted various methods to accomplish these tasks while keeping themselves out of harm’s way.


On supporting science journalism

If you're enjoying this article, consider supporting our award-winning journalism by subscribing. By purchasing a subscription you are helping to ensure the future of impactful stories about the discoveries and ideas shaping our world today.


Trench warfare: a sniper wearing a French helmet stays safely hidden behind a parapet while hunting for targets with the help of a trench periscope, 1916.
Credit: Scientific American, May 6, 1916

The trench periscope was widely used, and could be made from simple materials such as two mirrors shown here, or could be manufactured by elegant optical manufacturers whose sales of opera glasses had declined. The sniper was as much a target as a lethal actor; the principles behind the contraption shown here were also used for machine guns.

-

Our full archive of the war, called Scientific American Chronicles: World War I, has many articles from 1914–1918 on trench warfare in the First World War. It is available for purchase at www.scientificamerican.com/products/world-war-i/

It’s Time to Stand Up for Science

If you enjoyed this article, I’d like to ask for your support. Scientific American has served as an advocate for science and industry for 180 years, and right now may be the most critical moment in that two-century history.

I’ve been a Scientific American subscriber since I was 12 years old, and it helped shape the way I look at the world. SciAm always educates and delights me, and inspires a sense of awe for our vast, beautiful universe. I hope it does that for you, too.

If you subscribe to Scientific American, you help ensure that our coverage is centered on meaningful research and discovery; that we have the resources to report on the decisions that threaten labs across the U.S.; and that we support both budding and working scientists at a time when the value of science itself too often goes unrecognized.

In return, you get essential news, captivating podcasts, brilliant infographics, can't-miss newsletters, must-watch videos, challenging games, and the science world's best writing and reporting. You can even gift someone a subscription.

There has never been a more important time for us to stand up and show why science matters. I hope you’ll support us in that mission.

Thank you,

David M. Ewalt, Editor in Chief, Scientific American

Subscribe