The Dash of Cavalry in the Great War

Reported in Scientific American, This Week in World War I: October 3, 1914 The opening weeks of the First World War saw sweeping movements of vast armies.

Join Our Community of Science Lovers!

This article was published in Scientific American’s former blog network and reflects the views of the author, not necessarily those of Scientific American


Reported in Scientific American, This Week in World War I: October 3, 1914

WWI Cavalry

German cavalry cross a river (probably in France or Belgium), 1914. The men hang onto the horses, who propel the boat across the stream.

The opening weeks of the First World War saw sweeping movements of vast armies. Generals seeking quick tactical victories hoped to outflank or “pierce” or “break through” the enemy’s line, and then exploit this success by sending cavalry charging through the breach to roll up the loose ends of the enemy’s line. As time went on and the trench lines solidified, the war bogged down into a deadlock on the Western Front. Soldiers on horseback would become fairly useless, their mounts left far behind the lines as the troops dismounted to fight in the trenches. But in the early days of the war, cavalry was seen by all sides as a key to a quick and convincing victory:


On supporting science journalism

If you're enjoying this article, consider supporting our award-winning journalism by subscribing. By purchasing a subscription you are helping to ensure the future of impactful stories about the discoveries and ideas shaping our world today.


“The German line runs from near Lille ... to the Swiss border. The Allies are trying to break through this line near St. Quentin in the north and also in the hills north of Verdun. The Germans are trying the same strategy under more unfavorable conditions just east of Rheims, and also north of Toul. Both of the opposing armies are trying the same strategy; the side that succeeds first will force the other back. The danger in having the line pierced lies in the breaking up of the co-ordination of the armies of the defense. When such immense forces are engaged every step of the operations requires co-operation. If the plan is broken up it is difficult to gather up the loose ends to fit the new conditions. The successful assailant has better control of his forces, and can readily turn them where they will gain the greatest results. By concentrating first on one part and later on the other of the divided enemy he can crush the opposing armies in detail.”

It’s Time to Stand Up for Science

If you enjoyed this article, I’d like to ask for your support. Scientific American has served as an advocate for science and industry for 180 years, and right now may be the most critical moment in that two-century history.

I’ve been a Scientific American subscriber since I was 12 years old, and it helped shape the way I look at the world. SciAm always educates and delights me, and inspires a sense of awe for our vast, beautiful universe. I hope it does that for you, too.

If you subscribe to Scientific American, you help ensure that our coverage is centered on meaningful research and discovery; that we have the resources to report on the decisions that threaten labs across the U.S.; and that we support both budding and working scientists at a time when the value of science itself too often goes unrecognized.

In return, you get essential news, captivating podcasts, brilliant infographics, can't-miss newsletters, must-watch videos, challenging games, and the science world's best writing and reporting. You can even gift someone a subscription.

There has never been a more important time for us to stand up and show why science matters. I hope you’ll support us in that mission.

Thank you,

David M. Ewalt, Editor in Chief, Scientific American

Subscribe