This Week in World War I: August 15, 1914

Germany’s Opening Gambit The German attack on Belgium and France, starting on August 4, 1914, was designed to deliver a crushing blow to the French armies before the Russians and British could mobilize; after defeating the French, the Germans planned to use their extensive railway system to rush their forces to the eastern front to [...]

Join Our Community of Science Lovers!

This article was published in Scientific American’s former blog network and reflects the views of the author, not necessarily those of Scientific American


Reported in Scientific American, This Week in World War I: August 15, 1914

The German attack on Belgium and France, starting on August 4, 1914, was designed to deliver a crushing blow to the French armies before the Russians and British could mobilize; after defeating the French, the Germans planned to use their extensive railway system to rush their forces to the eastern front to deliver a powerful attack on the Russians. Our editorial was accurate on the weakened state of Austria, which invaded, and was quickly beaten back by, the tiny nation of Serbia (or Servia as we called it back then). Eventually, the Russians proved weaker than the Germans had feared, but the French and British proved much stronger.

A graphical comparison of the artillery strength of Russia, France and England versus Germany and Austria. The U.S. artillery strength is the tiny cannon at the top left. Credit: Scientific American, August 15, 1914


On supporting science journalism

If you're enjoying this article, consider supporting our award-winning journalism by subscribing. By purchasing a subscription you are helping to ensure the future of impactful stories about the discoveries and ideas shaping our world today.


From the issue of 100 years ago: August 15, 1914:

The Napoleon of the Twentieth Century

Chief among the many dramatic features of the opening scenes of the great European war drama, is the superb daring with which the German "War Lord" has launched his mighty army against what is practically the united naval and military strength of the rest of Europe.

For the neutrality of Italy has withdrawn from the Triple Alliance a great army and a powerful navy of the most modern type. This defection leaves the Mediterranean Sea so completely in the control of the Triple Entente, that the Austrian fleet will probably never venture forth from the protection of its naval base. The Austrian army has yet to win its laurels; for, as every student of history knows, the military history of Austria has been marked more by defeat than victory. With Russia's army of triple her own strength to the north, and with the warlike Servians and a doubtful Italy to the south, Austria will be so closely concerned with her own defense, as to be able to render but limited assistance in the immediate field of operations covered by the German armies.

Upon Germany, then, will fall the stupendous task of inflicting a decisive defeat upon the combined armies of France, Russia, Great Britain, Belgium and and as seems not unlikely, of Denmark also.

To see a full archive of our coverage of World War I—military, economic, social, technological—view our archive package, Scientific American Chronicles: World War I, at www.ScientificAmerican.com/wwi.

It’s Time to Stand Up for Science

If you enjoyed this article, I’d like to ask for your support. Scientific American has served as an advocate for science and industry for 180 years, and right now may be the most critical moment in that two-century history.

I’ve been a Scientific American subscriber since I was 12 years old, and it helped shape the way I look at the world. SciAm always educates and delights me, and inspires a sense of awe for our vast, beautiful universe. I hope it does that for you, too.

If you subscribe to Scientific American, you help ensure that our coverage is centered on meaningful research and discovery; that we have the resources to report on the decisions that threaten labs across the U.S.; and that we support both budding and working scientists at a time when the value of science itself too often goes unrecognized.

In return, you get essential news, captivating podcasts, brilliant infographics, can't-miss newsletters, must-watch videos, challenging games, and the science world's best writing and reporting. You can even gift someone a subscription.

There has never been a more important time for us to stand up and show why science matters. I hope you’ll support us in that mission.

Thank you,

David M. Ewalt, Editor in Chief, Scientific American

Subscribe