X-Rays at War, 1915

Reported in Scientific American, This Week in World War I: January 30, 1915 X-rays were used for medical operations within a couple of months after they were discovered by Wilhelm Roentgen in late 1895.

Join Our Community of Science Lovers!

This article was published in Scientific American’s former blog network and reflects the views of the author, not necessarily those of Scientific American


Reported in Scientific American, This Week in World War I: January 30, 1915

Field medicine arrives in the 20th century: a Panhard-Levassor van with equipment from the Paris firm of Gaiffe provided X-rays during the French army's 1904 maneuvers. Image: Scientific American Supplement, January 30, 1915

X-rays were used for medical operations within a couple of months after they were discovered by Wilhelm Roentgen in late 1895. Their usefulness was also quickly recognized by military surgeons: suddenly it became easy to find broken bones, bullets and chunks of shrapnel in wounded soldiers. During the next few years “Roentgen rays” helped diagnose injuries to troops in the Greco-Turkish War, the Russo-Japanese War, and the Balkan Wars. Mobile units were developed to keep up with field hospitals: if surgery could be performed, X-rays became vital. The two units showed here were developed for army use: a motorized version for the French army developed in 1904, and a horse-drawn version (with its own motor for electricity supply) for field use by the German army. Here is the description of the use and limitations of mobile X-ray units by Surgeon-Major Dr. Strauss, head of a Roentgen laboratory for the German army:


On supporting science journalism

If you're enjoying this article, consider supporting our award-winning journalism by subscribing. By purchasing a subscription you are helping to ensure the future of impactful stories about the discoveries and ideas shaping our world today.


Horse-drawn X-ray cart used by the German army, 1915: the interior of the cart. One of the biggest problems for X-ray use was a suitable electricity supply. These units generated their own electricity. J, inductor; K, cable ; M, motor ; R, case for the X-ray tube (the Crookes tube); Rf, reflector; S, switchboard ; W, contact-breaker. Image: Scientific American Supplement, January 30, 1915

“The Roentgen process is only applicable when it is possible to take definite medical measures. To send the military Roentgen wagon to the spot where first aid is given to the wounded, or to the field hospital , which is often moved five or six times, would be nonsense. All demands that this should be done come from those who neither understand military conditions nor the Roentgen process. Examinations with the Roentgen rays can only be made where quiet and settled conditions prevail. Anything so costly to procure as a field Roentgen outfit should not fall into the hands of the enemy or be destroyed when troops are obliged to fall back. It should also be remembered that the use of the Roentgen rays is a very precise process, and that rough work in the open air without the equipment for a dark room, etc., cannot be thought of. Consequently, these outfits are distributed among the military hospitals. There, where there is quiet and security, the Roentgen process accomplishes positive results.”

Our full archive of the war, called Scientific American Chronicles: World War I, has many articles from 1914-1918, including a number on wartime medicine. It is available for purchase at www.ScientificAmerican.com/wwi

It’s Time to Stand Up for Science

If you enjoyed this article, I’d like to ask for your support. Scientific American has served as an advocate for science and industry for 180 years, and right now may be the most critical moment in that two-century history.

I’ve been a Scientific American subscriber since I was 12 years old, and it helped shape the way I look at the world. SciAm always educates and delights me, and inspires a sense of awe for our vast, beautiful universe. I hope it does that for you, too.

If you subscribe to Scientific American, you help ensure that our coverage is centered on meaningful research and discovery; that we have the resources to report on the decisions that threaten labs across the U.S.; and that we support both budding and working scientists at a time when the value of science itself too often goes unrecognized.

In return, you get essential news, captivating podcasts, brilliant infographics, can't-miss newsletters, must-watch videos, challenging games, and the science world's best writing and reporting. You can even gift someone a subscription.

There has never been a more important time for us to stand up and show why science matters. I hope you’ll support us in that mission.

Thank you,

David M. Ewalt, Editor in Chief, Scientific American

Subscribe