Can Smart Phones Help Create Smarter Science?

Join Our Community of Science Lovers!

This article was published in Scientific American’s former blog network and reflects the views of the author, not necessarily those of Scientific American


Can smart phones change the way we do research? Cognitive scientists believe that they may provide a vital means of widening the participant pool, as discussed in a recent September PLoS paper that explores the intersection of technology and behavioral experiments.

The potential application of Internet-based research to extend laboratory exercises to wider audiences has been a tantalizingly frustrating endeavor. While it can make available a larger and possibly more diverse sample for researchers, measuring precision has been a large concern. Technological data collection strategies do not record the minute changes that constitute cognitive processes.

Smartphones may change this.


On supporting science journalism

If you're enjoying this article, consider supporting our award-winning journalism by subscribing. By purchasing a subscription you are helping to ensure the future of impactful stories about the discoveries and ideas shaping our world today.


Researchers used the iPhone/iPad devices to test a classic cognitive psychology task and have found that their results for data submitted from these devices closely match the data in similar tasks in a laboratory setting. The iPhone/iPad devices offer "high temporal and spatial resolution with built-in millisecond timing of stimuli display and touchscreen responses" (1). Not to mention, the devices are essentially identical, highly portable, and media ready. Participants only have to "opt-in" to the study by downloading an app.

The task the researchers chose was the lexical decision task, which asks participants to identify words (TABLE) from non-words (TIBLE), and measures response time and accuracy. They designed a freely available app which tested responses to these types of stimuli and invited participants to submit their responses via email. Participants could also provide basic demographic information if they chose. The researchers report collecting 4157 responses in four months, noting that it took more than three years to collect similar amounts of data (2).

If smartphone technology can assist as a data-collection tool, it has the potential to help cross cultural boundaries in research. It's a uniform object that a growing number of people around the world have within arm's length at almost all times. Would you be more willing to participate in formal research projects via apps, if you could? What would encourage you to participate?

--

Referenced:

Dufau S, Duñabeitia JA, Moret-Tatay C, McGonigal A, Peeters D, Alario FX, Balota DA, Brysbaert M, Carreiras M, Ferrand L, Ktori M, Perea M, Rastle K, Sasburg O, Yap MJ, Ziegler JC, & Grainger J (2011). Smart phone, smart science: how the use of smartphones can revolutionize research in cognitive science. PloS one, 6 (9) PMID: 21980370

It’s Time to Stand Up for Science

If you enjoyed this article, I’d like to ask for your support. Scientific American has served as an advocate for science and industry for 180 years, and right now may be the most critical moment in that two-century history.

I’ve been a Scientific American subscriber since I was 12 years old, and it helped shape the way I look at the world. SciAm always educates and delights me, and inspires a sense of awe for our vast, beautiful universe. I hope it does that for you, too.

If you subscribe to Scientific American, you help ensure that our coverage is centered on meaningful research and discovery; that we have the resources to report on the decisions that threaten labs across the U.S.; and that we support both budding and working scientists at a time when the value of science itself too often goes unrecognized.

In return, you get essential news, captivating podcasts, brilliant infographics, can't-miss newsletters, must-watch videos, challenging games, and the science world's best writing and reporting. You can even gift someone a subscription.

There has never been a more important time for us to stand up and show why science matters. I hope you’ll support us in that mission.

Thank you,

David M. Ewalt, Editor in Chief, Scientific American

Subscribe