Can Smart Phones Help Create Smarter Science?

Join Our Community of Science Lovers!

This article was published in Scientific American’s former blog network and reflects the views of the author, not necessarily those of Scientific American


Can smart phones change the way we do research? Cognitive scientists believe that they may provide a vital means of widening the participant pool, as discussed in a recent September PLoS paper that explores the intersection of technology and behavioral experiments.

The potential application of Internet-based research to extend laboratory exercises to wider audiences has been a tantalizingly frustrating endeavor. While it can make available a larger and possibly more diverse sample for researchers, measuring precision has been a large concern. Technological data collection strategies do not record the minute changes that constitute cognitive processes.

Smartphones may change this.


On supporting science journalism

If you're enjoying this article, consider supporting our award-winning journalism by subscribing. By purchasing a subscription you are helping to ensure the future of impactful stories about the discoveries and ideas shaping our world today.


Researchers used the iPhone/iPad devices to test a classic cognitive psychology task and have found that their results for data submitted from these devices closely match the data in similar tasks in a laboratory setting. The iPhone/iPad devices offer "high temporal and spatial resolution with built-in millisecond timing of stimuli display and touchscreen responses" (1). Not to mention, the devices are essentially identical, highly portable, and media ready. Participants only have to "opt-in" to the study by downloading an app.

The task the researchers chose was the lexical decision task, which asks participants to identify words (TABLE) from non-words (TIBLE), and measures response time and accuracy. They designed a freely available app which tested responses to these types of stimuli and invited participants to submit their responses via email. Participants could also provide basic demographic information if they chose. The researchers report collecting 4157 responses in four months, noting that it took more than three years to collect similar amounts of data (2).

If smartphone technology can assist as a data-collection tool, it has the potential to help cross cultural boundaries in research. It's a uniform object that a growing number of people around the world have within arm's length at almost all times. Would you be more willing to participate in formal research projects via apps, if you could? What would encourage you to participate?

--

Referenced:

Dufau S, Duñabeitia JA, Moret-Tatay C, McGonigal A, Peeters D, Alario FX, Balota DA, Brysbaert M, Carreiras M, Ferrand L, Ktori M, Perea M, Rastle K, Sasburg O, Yap MJ, Ziegler JC, & Grainger J (2011). Smart phone, smart science: how the use of smartphones can revolutionize research in cognitive science. PloS one, 6 (9) PMID: 21980370

Subscribe to Support Independent Journalism

Great science journalism requires human expertise, time, effort and creativity. And it costs money. That’s why I and the journalists here at Scientific American hope you’ll join our community.

When you subscribe, you are supporting staff and freelance journalists who are passionate about telling science stories that are true, important and compelling. Our editors and reporters are often experts in their fields, which means they understand the nuances of big discoveries and can untangle the breakthroughs from the hype. With a subscription, you are also supporting rigorous fact-checking to ensure the words we publish are precise and accurate. And you’re supporting original illustrations, graphics and photos that bring you closer to an advanced laboratory, an ice sheet in Antarctica or a space mission in orbit. You’re helping us craft other types of high-quality journalism as well: Our newsletters are carefully written, edited and curated by staffers you have or will come to know and love. Our Science Quickly podcast is based on original reporting, collaboration with editors and scientists and exacting production.

Subscriptions keep this engine running so we can continue to deliver thoughtful, rigorous and independent science journalism to you. In an era of viral misinformation, this work is crucial. If you value what we do, I hope you’ll consider joining us as a subscriber

Thank you,

Jeanna Bryner, Editor in Chief, Scientific American

Subscribe