August 4, 2011

Google Logo Add Us On GoogleAdd SciAm

Editor's Selections: Adult Brains, Frozen DNA, Stimulating Speech, and Smelly Knights

By Krystal D'Costa

Join Our Community of Science Lovers!

This article was published in Scientific American’s former blog network and reflects the views of the author, not necessarily those of Scientific American

On supporting science journalism

If you're enjoying this article, consider supporting our award-winning journalism by subscribing. By purchasing a subscription you are helping to ensure the future of impactful stories about the discoveries and ideas shaping our world today.

Here are my ResearchBlogging.org picks for this past week:

  • It turns out that there is truth to the statement that thirty is the new twenty - well, at least in terms of brain development. Sort of. It turns out that the long held belief that the "adult brain" is in place by the time we hit our twenties is questionable--the Neuroskeptic has the scoop with a new study on brain maturation.

  • At Contagions, Michelle Ziegler highlights the challenges of DNA extraction with a case study involving bodies found in the Siberian permafrost, which one would assume would result in better-than-average samples.

  • Could sexual inhibitions make us quieter? At A Replicated Typo, Sean Roberts discusses the relationship between sonority (loudness of vowels in a language) and sexual behavior, which may provide some interesting insights on linguistic variation.

  • And finally, SciCurious delivers a serious blow to the myth of the knight in shining armor as a suave and cool fellow. Turns out that we overlook how heavy armor was in our nostalgic fits--which means that we overlook how sweaty these guys probably were. At Neurotic Physiology SciCurious also helpfully educates readers on the many types of armor. So perhaps not all armor was equally sweaty.

I'll be back next week with more from the social sciences.

Subscribe to Support Independent Journalism

Great science journalism requires human expertise, time, effort and creativity. And it costs money. That’s why I and the journalists here at Scientific American hope you’ll join our community.

When you subscribe, you are supporting staff and freelance journalists who are passionate about telling science stories that are true, important and compelling. Our editors and reporters are often experts in their fields, which means they understand the nuances of big discoveries and can untangle the breakthroughs from the hype. With a subscription, you are also supporting rigorous fact-checking to ensure the words we publish are precise and accurate. And you’re supporting original illustrations, graphics and photos that bring you closer to an advanced laboratory, an ice sheet in Antarctica or a space mission in orbit. You’re helping us craft other types of high-quality journalism as well: Our newsletters are carefully written, edited and curated by staffers you have or will come to know and love. Our Science Quickly podcast is based on original reporting, collaboration with editors and scientists and exacting production.

Subscriptions keep this engine running so we can continue to deliver thoughtful, rigorous and independent science journalism to you. In an era of viral misinformation, this work is crucial. If you value what we do, I hope you’ll consider joining us as a subscriber

Thank you,

Jeanna Bryner, Editor in Chief, Scientific American

Subscribe