Editor's Selections: Venereal Diseases Galore, Facebook Brains, and Subtitles

Join Our Community of Science Lovers!

This article was published in Scientific American’s former blog network and reflects the views of the author, not necessarily those of Scientific American


Ed Note: Part of my online life includes editorial duties at ResearchBlogging.org, where I serve as the Social Sciences Editor. Each Thursday, I pick notable posts on research in anthropology, philosophy, social science, and research to share on the ResearchBlogging.org News site. To help highlight this writing, I also share my selections here on AiP.

 

It's a bit of a sickly week at ResearchBlogging.org:


On supporting science journalism

If you're enjoying this article, consider supporting our award-winning journalism by subscribing. By purchasing a subscription you are helping to ensure the future of impactful stories about the discoveries and ideas shaping our world today.


  • At Contagions, Michelle Ziegler investigates the plague genome, describing recently employed techniques for extracting DNA. She reminds us that the more we know, the better prepared we may eventually be.

  • At Body Horrors, readers will learn that HPV is apparently an occupational hazard for a certain group—and it's not the one you're thinking of. Butchers and fishmongers are apparently susceptible to the virus due to their handling of raw meats—and we don't quite know why that is.

  • Speaking of STDs, Kristina Killgrove at Powered by Osteons explores documentation of syphilis dating to the Roman occupation of Spain in the 3rd-century AD. This study adds to the growing body of research that may help us understand where (in the world) syphilis originated and increase our understanding of epidemiology overall.

  • Shifting gears, let's look at the brain. Many of us may be mindful of Facebook—checking in every hour (or couple of minutes) to see what's new, but can trace our participation to brain structure? The Neuroskeptic tackles a recently released study that finds people with more Facebook friends have denser grey matter in three regions of the brain. The study is fairly sound, but raises questions about the potential significance of this grey matter IRL. As the Neuroskeptic rightly suggests, "It could be that having lots of friends makes your brain bigger. Or it could be the reverse, that having a certain kind of brain wins you friends, or at least Facebook ones."

  • And finally, in a most interesting post, Ingrid Pillar of Language on the Move discusses the politics of subtitling, and how these choices reflect identity formation and othering.

I'll be back next week with more from anthropology, philosophy, and research.

It’s Time to Stand Up for Science

If you enjoyed this article, I’d like to ask for your support. Scientific American has served as an advocate for science and industry for 180 years, and right now may be the most critical moment in that two-century history.

I’ve been a Scientific American subscriber since I was 12 years old, and it helped shape the way I look at the world. SciAm always educates and delights me, and inspires a sense of awe for our vast, beautiful universe. I hope it does that for you, too.

If you subscribe to Scientific American, you help ensure that our coverage is centered on meaningful research and discovery; that we have the resources to report on the decisions that threaten labs across the U.S.; and that we support both budding and working scientists at a time when the value of science itself too often goes unrecognized.

In return, you get essential news, captivating podcasts, brilliant infographics, can't-miss newsletters, must-watch videos, challenging games, and the science world's best writing and reporting. You can even gift someone a subscription.

There has never been a more important time for us to stand up and show why science matters. I hope you’ll support us in that mission.

Thank you,

David M. Ewalt, Editor in Chief, Scientific American

Subscribe