How Zooplankton Bust a Move

Though plankton drift with the ocean currents, that doesn’t mean they’re incapable of any movement. Many of them can move to find food or mates, and they do so in some surprising and sometimes entertaining ways.

Join Our Community of Science Lovers!

This article was published in Scientific American’s former blog network and reflects the views of the author, not necessarily those of Scientific American


Though plankton drift with the ocean currents, that doesn't mean they're incapable of any movement. Many of them can move to find food or mates, and they do so in some surprising and sometimes entertaining ways.

Just have a look at this sampler of dinoflagellaes, ciliates, rotifers, cladocerans, and copepod larvae and adults put together by Thomas Kiørboe and his colleagues at the Technical University of Denmark, Woods Hole Oceanographic Institution in Massachusetts, and the Estación de Fotobiolgoía Playa Unión in Argentina.


On supporting science journalism

If you're enjoying this article, consider supporting our award-winning journalism by subscribing. By purchasing a subscription you are helping to ensure the future of impactful stories about the discoveries and ideas shaping our world today.


The first creature -- a dinoflagellate -- wanders about like a wind-up mouse, complete with comic flapping tail. The rotifer at :12 seems to be some sort of larval Cthulhu. The ciliate protist at :20 looks and moves like some sort of alien probe. A copepod looks like a muscle-armed body builder (:43), and others waves their arms like fan dancers (1:08 & 1:17) or like they're gettin' down with their bad selves at Club Plankton (:54).

But did you notice any patterns? Kiørboe and colleagues did, and that is the subject of their new paper "Flow disturbances generated by feeding and swimming zooplankton" in the Aug. 12 issue of The Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

For plankton, moving is necessary but dangerous. Their predators have a nasty habit of finding prey by sensing moving water. So Kiørboe et al. hypothesized that plankton that are able to just swim and not simultaneously feed will have evolved ways to do so as quietly as possible. On the other hand, plankton both moving and swimming should be willing to disturb more water, because feeding is so critical to survival that it is worth taking a greater risk to do it (in this, penguins are no different from plankton).

Indeed, to get enough to eat, zooplankton must daily process water equivalent to

100,000 1,000,000* times their own body volume, so there's no getting around the fluid disturbance that demands. On the other hand, if the only purpose of swimming is to get from Point A to Point B, there's no reason that natural selection shouldn't have favored methods of getting that done that disturb as little water as possible, as briefly as possible.

That is exactly what the scientists found when they observed particle flow around moving plankton. Plankton simply swimming tended to do so quietly by jumping -- unleashing a sudden power stroke powered by a limb or limbs on one side of the body. Or they used the breaststroke, in which paired limbs are pushed forward and rapidly backward in a jet propulsion-like motion.

Either strategy produces only a small volume of moving water that quickly stills, while maximizing the distance the organism travels. Thus swimmers make only small, brief, disturbances interspersed with stillness that makes them invisible to predators for the majority of the time they are "moving".

Feeders and feeding swimmers, on the other hand, were noisy, constantly beating flagella or other appendages. They continually disturbed much more water.

Further, the scientists found that this pattern of swimming strategies held regardless of how distantly related the plankton or how big or small they were, implying they all evolved similar solutions to the same problem, evidence of our old pal convergent evolution. If you go back and rewatch the movie now, you should be able to see and identify all of these popular strategies in action.

*Thank you to Prof. Kiørboe for pointing out this error! Even more amazing!

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Zxmt4PX6gto

Reference

Kiorboe T., H. Jianhg, R. J. Goncalves, L. T. Nielsen & N. Wadhwa (2014). Flow disturbances generated by feeding and swimming zooplankton, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 111 (32) 11738-11743. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1405260111

It’s Time to Stand Up for Science

If you enjoyed this article, I’d like to ask for your support. Scientific American has served as an advocate for science and industry for 180 years, and right now may be the most critical moment in that two-century history.

I’ve been a Scientific American subscriber since I was 12 years old, and it helped shape the way I look at the world. SciAm always educates and delights me, and inspires a sense of awe for our vast, beautiful universe. I hope it does that for you, too.

If you subscribe to Scientific American, you help ensure that our coverage is centered on meaningful research and discovery; that we have the resources to report on the decisions that threaten labs across the U.S.; and that we support both budding and working scientists at a time when the value of science itself too often goes unrecognized.

In return, you get essential news, captivating podcasts, brilliant infographics, can't-miss newsletters, must-watch videos, challenging games, and the science world's best writing and reporting. You can even gift someone a subscription.

There has never been a more important time for us to stand up and show why science matters. I hope you’ll support us in that mission.

Thank you,

David M. Ewalt, Editor in Chief, Scientific American

Subscribe