My Interview on the Pacific Northwest Cryptococcus Outbreak on SCPR
I have just a quick update today as I’m working on a long blog post for this weekend. Last week I gave an interview for the Southern California Public Radio show “Take Two” on my feature story in this month’s issue of Scientific American on the outbreak of the yeast Cryptococcus gattii among people living [...]
By Jennifer Frazer
This article was published in Scientific American’s former blog network and reflects the views of the author, not necessarily those of Scientific American
On supporting science journalism
If you're enjoying this article, consider supporting our award-winning journalism by subscribing. By purchasing a subscription you are helping to ensure the future of impactful stories about the discoveries and ideas shaping our world today.
Cryptococcus neoformans, a visually indistinguishable relative of C. gattii. CDC; public domain.
I have just a quick update today as I'm working on a long blog post for this weekend. Last week I gave an interview for the Southern California Public Radio show "Take Two" on my feature story in this month's issue of Scientific American on the outbreak of the yeast Cryptococcus gattii among people living in the Pacific Northwest. It's six and a half minutes long and you can listen to it here.
They arranged for me to come to my local NPR affiliate to give the interview in their special recording studio, which was pretty exciting and nerve-wracking all at once. I'm still relatively new to this getting interviewed (as opposed to interviewing) business and in my haste and nervousness, I made a few small errors. For instance, I know the rainforests in the Pacific Northwest are temperate, not tropical. Nevertheless, I'm happy with the end result and I think the public radio folk did a good job assembling the interview. Enjoy!
Subscribe to Support Independent Journalism
Great science journalism requires human expertise, time, effort and creativity. And it costs money. That’s why I and the journalists here at Scientific American hope you’ll join our community.
When you subscribe, you are supporting staff and freelance journalists who are passionate about telling science stories that are true, important and compelling. Our editors and reporters are often experts in their fields, which means they understand the nuances of big discoveries and can untangle the breakthroughs from the hype. With a subscription, you are also supporting rigorous fact-checking to ensure the words we publish are precise and accurate. And you’re supporting original illustrations, graphics and photos that bring you closer to an advanced laboratory, an ice sheet in Antarctica or a space mission in orbit. You’re helping us craft other types of high-quality journalism as well: Our newsletters are carefully written, edited and curated by staffers you have or will come to know and love. Our Science Quickly podcast is based on original reporting, collaboration with editors and scientists and exacting production.
Subscriptions keep this engine running so we can continue to deliver thoughtful, rigorous and independent science journalism to you. In an era of viral misinformation, this work is crucial. If you value what we do, I hope you’ll consider joining us as a subscriber
