New Urban Naturalist Program Fills an Important Void

As schools have abandoned natural history education, it is up to zoos, botanic gardens and science museums to step up

Join Our Community of Science Lovers!

This article was published in Scientific American’s former blog network and reflects the views of the author, not necessarily those of Scientific American


Natural history has taken a big hit in public schools and universities, where it is hardly taught. I’ve written about that unfortunate decline and its significance twice here before, but I recently learned of a new program that may be an important step in the right direction.

This spring the New York Botanical Garden will begin offering an Urban Naturalist Certificate Program. The program aims to generate citizen scientists through a combination of observations, lectures, and field trips on the plants and animals of New York City's natural areas. Using ruler, loupe, binoculars and (the oft-dreaded) dichotomous keys to identify organisms, the students will describe and photograph their finds on iNaturalist and elsewhere. And they will learn to give interpretive nature tours themselves.

The course meets for five weeks three times a week on Tuesdays, Thursdays and Saturdays. During weekdays students will hear lectures and explore the botanic garden. On Saturday field excursions, the students will visit Central Park, Pelham Bay Park, and other urban natural areas. According to the program’s coordinator, the organizers believe it is the first continuing education program to ever offer a general comprehensive introduction to the city’s natural history.


On supporting science journalism

If you're enjoying this article, consider supporting our award-winning journalism by subscribing. By purchasing a subscription you are helping to ensure the future of impactful stories about the discoveries and ideas shaping our world today.


The only thing I am not enthusiastic about is the course’s price: $1,145 for botanic garden members and $1,259 for non-members. I understand 60 hours of three instructors’ time is a lot, but it will be hard to attract people who aren’t already certain they love natural history – or already know much of the course’s content – at that price. In order to reach the general public we are going to have to find a more affordable option. Perhaps the students of this program can go out and start their own less expensive courses to reach a still broader audience.

Regardless of its steep price, it is a brilliant concept, and something more botanic gardens, zoos, and natural history museums in the United States and around the world should seriously consider creating more of. If schools will not offer natural history instruction, then these other institutions should do what they can to pick up the slack. People cannot value or protect what they don’t realize exists.

The course begins April 19, and interested parties can find out more here.

It’s Time to Stand Up for Science

If you enjoyed this article, I’d like to ask for your support. Scientific American has served as an advocate for science and industry for 180 years, and right now may be the most critical moment in that two-century history.

I’ve been a Scientific American subscriber since I was 12 years old, and it helped shape the way I look at the world. SciAm always educates and delights me, and inspires a sense of awe for our vast, beautiful universe. I hope it does that for you, too.

If you subscribe to Scientific American, you help ensure that our coverage is centered on meaningful research and discovery; that we have the resources to report on the decisions that threaten labs across the U.S.; and that we support both budding and working scientists at a time when the value of science itself too often goes unrecognized.

In return, you get essential news, captivating podcasts, brilliant infographics, can't-miss newsletters, must-watch videos, challenging games, and the science world's best writing and reporting. You can even gift someone a subscription.

There has never been a more important time for us to stand up and show why science matters. I hope you’ll support us in that mission.

Thank you,

David M. Ewalt, Editor in Chief, Scientific American

Subscribe