Organ Stealing and Slave Driving Rampant among—Plankton?

Ocean microbes long thought to depend exclusively on eating turn out to have a solid, if sinister, Plan B

Join Our Community of Science Lovers!

This article was published in Scientific American’s former blog network and reflects the views of the author, not necessarily those of Scientific American


Everyone knows the ocean is full of plankton. How else would whales eat? What you may not know is how slippery and underhanded said plankton can be. Really, it deserves to get eaten by those whales.

Because as it turns out, according to a 2017 study, about half of the microscopic plankton traditionally thought of as animal-like – that is, completely dependent on eating things to survive – have a dirty little secret: they also have the option of making their own food, but only after capturing an innocent green microbe and … well, it’s not nice.

They may engulf and enslave them.


On supporting science journalism

If you're enjoying this article, consider supporting our award-winning journalism by subscribing. By purchasing a subscription you are helping to ensure the future of impactful stories about the discoveries and ideas shaping our world today.


Or they my simply eat them and steal their chloroplasts.

The perpetrators are complex single-celled organisms that are fascinating to watch. Here is Dinophysis sucking the chloroplasts out of a hapless victim.

And here is Strombidium, doing its best impression of a winged canopic jar or flying heart. There appear to be lots of orange-ish chloroplasts stuffed inside. It periodically inflates and deflates some sort of organelle (a contractile vacuole?), giving he impression of breathing.

This Mesodinium is a bowling pin-shaped creature whose cilia appear to rotate.

 

Here's Noctiluca scintillans, a protist that takes photosynthetic hostages but also lights up when disturbed, giving it the nickname "sea sparkle". This individual is lazily waving a flagellum, whose usual function is to stuff food inside and sweep waste out. The baggy body appears to be empty of involuntary house guests.

Although completely unrelated to the topic of this post, add some serious joy to your day with this video of Nocitluca’s bioluminescent capabilities.

Upending previous assumptions that such plankton are oddballs, the 2017 analysis of oceanographic encounters with these organisms revealed that they are “ubiquitous and abundant”.

The catch-and-enslave type is found most often in the open ocean where food and victims are scarce. Better to ensure a steady supply of eggs than to fry the chicken straight away when you're not sure when you'll find your next bird.

The strip-and-consume type is more abundant in the marine equivalent of a 24-hour KFC, such as coastal and upwelling zones with nutrient-rich waters. They need a conveyer belt of prey to keep them well stocked in chloroplasts and essential nutrients.

The authors of this study heartily encouraged the creators of ocean models that do not take this rather significant new finding of unsuspected photosynthesis into account to, you know, fix them.

Reference

Leles, S. G., Aditee Mitra, Kevin J. Flynn, Diane K. Stoecker, Per Juel Hansen, Albert Calbet, George B. McManus et al. "Oceanic protists with different forms of acquired phototrophy display contrasting biogeographies and abundance." Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences 284, no. 1860 (2017): 20170664.

Subscribe to Support Independent Journalism

Great science journalism requires human expertise, time, effort and creativity. And it costs money. That’s why I and the journalists here at Scientific American hope you’ll join our community.

When you subscribe, you are supporting staff and freelance journalists who are passionate about telling science stories that are true, important and compelling. Our editors and reporters are often experts in their fields, which means they understand the nuances of big discoveries and can untangle the breakthroughs from the hype. With a subscription, you are also supporting rigorous fact-checking to ensure the words we publish are precise and accurate. And you’re supporting original illustrations, graphics and photos that bring you closer to an advanced laboratory, an ice sheet in Antarctica or a space mission in orbit. You’re helping us craft other types of high-quality journalism as well: Our newsletters are carefully written, edited and curated by staffers you have or will come to know and love. Our Science Quickly podcast is based on original reporting, collaboration with editors and scientists and exacting production.

Subscriptions keep this engine running so we can continue to deliver thoughtful, rigorous and independent science journalism to you. In an era of viral misinformation, this work is crucial. If you value what we do, I hope you’ll consider joining us as a subscriber

Thank you,

Jeanna Bryner, Editor in Chief, Scientific American

Subscribe