The Brain-Eating Amoeba in Minnesota -- Live

Join Our Community of Science Lovers!

This article was published in Scientific American’s former blog network and reflects the views of the author, not necessarily those of Scientific American


Last Thursday I received an email from the media coordinator for Scientific American about a brain-eating microbe. It's not every day you get to answer the call of duty on one of those.

Minnesota Public Radio had asked to interview me about a microorganism suspected in the death of a young boy in the state this year -- only the second time in the state's history and the second in two years. I'd written about the microbe -- Naegleria fowleri -- here twicebefore (including a discussion of why calling them "amoebas" is a bit of a misnomer).


On supporting science journalism

If you're enjoying this article, consider supporting our award-winning journalism by subscribing. By purchasing a subscription you are helping to ensure the future of impactful stories about the discoveries and ideas shaping our world today.


Intrigued (and more than a bit scared -- it would be my first live radio interview), I granted the request. Although they focused much more on the scare and less on the science than I would like, it was an interesting and overall good experience.

For example, I expected there to be some sort of person telling me "Annnnd . . . you're on!" Instead, they simply put me on hold by allowing me to listen to the radio broadcast as it was happening, including listening to a discussion of the interview with me that was about to come up. Talk about nerve-wracking!

Then, without any warning, what sounded on my phone for all the world just like listening to the radio in my car seamlessly transformed to live radio as the host thanked me for coming on. I was on air. I was on air? I think there's a pause on the recording before I awkwardly say "Good morning", because I can't quite believe what was just radio has turned into an actual phone conversation that I'm on.

In any case, Minnesota only had their first recorded case two years ago, and then their second in the same lake this year. It's a disease most often striking in warm stagnant water in the south, and the interviewer asked me about that. He also asked me about how scared people should be. I tried to emphasize that people need to put the risk of this disease in perspective -- it's a super rare infection. Many thousands more swimmers die from drowning than from brain-eating "amoebas" in any given year -- and your life, I would guess, is more in danger on the car ride to the lake than from N. fowleri once in the lake.

Here's a link to the interview. You'll need to hit play on the little audio player at the top of the summary.

Subscribe to Support Independent Journalism

Great science journalism requires human expertise, time, effort and creativity. And it costs money. That’s why I and the journalists here at Scientific American hope you’ll join our community.

When you subscribe, you are supporting staff and freelance journalists who are passionate about telling science stories that are true, important and compelling. Our editors and reporters are often experts in their fields, which means they understand the nuances of big discoveries and can untangle the breakthroughs from the hype. With a subscription, you are also supporting rigorous fact-checking to ensure the words we publish are precise and accurate. And you’re supporting original illustrations, graphics and photos that bring you closer to an advanced laboratory, an ice sheet in Antarctica or a space mission in orbit. You’re helping us craft other types of high-quality journalism as well: Our newsletters are carefully written, edited and curated by staffers you have or will come to know and love. Our Science Quickly podcast is based on original reporting, collaboration with editors and scientists and exacting production.

Subscriptions keep this engine running so we can continue to deliver thoughtful, rigorous and independent science journalism to you. In an era of viral misinformation, this work is crucial. If you value what we do, I hope you’ll consider joining us as a subscriber

Thank you,

Jeanna Bryner, Editor in Chief, Scientific American

Subscribe