The Brain-Eating Amoeba in Minnesota -- Live

Join Our Community of Science Lovers!

This article was published in Scientific American’s former blog network and reflects the views of the author, not necessarily those of Scientific American


Last Thursday I received an email from the media coordinator for Scientific American about a brain-eating microbe. It's not every day you get to answer the call of duty on one of those.

Minnesota Public Radio had asked to interview me about a microorganism suspected in the death of a young boy in the state this year -- only the second time in the state's history and the second in two years. I'd written about the microbe -- Naegleria fowleri -- here twicebefore (including a discussion of why calling them "amoebas" is a bit of a misnomer).


On supporting science journalism

If you're enjoying this article, consider supporting our award-winning journalism by subscribing. By purchasing a subscription you are helping to ensure the future of impactful stories about the discoveries and ideas shaping our world today.


Intrigued (and more than a bit scared -- it would be my first live radio interview), I granted the request. Although they focused much more on the scare and less on the science than I would like, it was an interesting and overall good experience.

For example, I expected there to be some sort of person telling me "Annnnd . . . you're on!" Instead, they simply put me on hold by allowing me to listen to the radio broadcast as it was happening, including listening to a discussion of the interview with me that was about to come up. Talk about nerve-wracking!

Then, without any warning, what sounded on my phone for all the world just like listening to the radio in my car seamlessly transformed to live radio as the host thanked me for coming on. I was on air. I was on air? I think there's a pause on the recording before I awkwardly say "Good morning", because I can't quite believe what was just radio has turned into an actual phone conversation that I'm on.

In any case, Minnesota only had their first recorded case two years ago, and then their second in the same lake this year. It's a disease most often striking in warm stagnant water in the south, and the interviewer asked me about that. He also asked me about how scared people should be. I tried to emphasize that people need to put the risk of this disease in perspective -- it's a super rare infection. Many thousands more swimmers die from drowning than from brain-eating "amoebas" in any given year -- and your life, I would guess, is more in danger on the car ride to the lake than from N. fowleri once in the lake.

Here's a link to the interview. You'll need to hit play on the little audio player at the top of the summary.

It’s Time to Stand Up for Science

If you enjoyed this article, I’d like to ask for your support. Scientific American has served as an advocate for science and industry for 180 years, and right now may be the most critical moment in that two-century history.

I’ve been a Scientific American subscriber since I was 12 years old, and it helped shape the way I look at the world. SciAm always educates and delights me, and inspires a sense of awe for our vast, beautiful universe. I hope it does that for you, too.

If you subscribe to Scientific American, you help ensure that our coverage is centered on meaningful research and discovery; that we have the resources to report on the decisions that threaten labs across the U.S.; and that we support both budding and working scientists at a time when the value of science itself too often goes unrecognized.

In return, you get essential news, captivating podcasts, brilliant infographics, can't-miss newsletters, must-watch videos, challenging games, and the science world's best writing and reporting. You can even gift someone a subscription.

There has never been a more important time for us to stand up and show why science matters. I hope you’ll support us in that mission.

Thank you,

David M. Ewalt, Editor in Chief, Scientific American

Subscribe