Hanging Out with Nobel Prize Winner Sir Harold Kroto

Join Our Community of Science Lovers!

This article was published in Scientific American’s former blog network and reflects the views of the author, not necessarily those of Scientific American



On supporting science journalism

If you're enjoying this article, consider supporting our award-winning journalism by subscribing. By purchasing a subscription you are helping to ensure the future of impactful stories about the discoveries and ideas shaping our world today.


[caption id="attachment_1002" align="alignright" width="300" caption="Sir Harold Kroto demonstrates the shape of a buckyball, a carbon molecule with 60 atoms. Credit: Google Science Fair"]
[/caption] What is it like to win a Nobel Prize? Should you worry about picking something "important" to work on as a scientist? How can art help in trying to understand how the universe works? And what is the real key to success? You can find out by watching today's Google Science Fair Hangout with Sir Harold Kroto, who shared the 1996 Nobel Prize in Chemistry for the discovery of carbon molecules called buckminsterfullerines, or buckyballs. The Google Science Fair is a global competition open to anyone between the ages of 13 and 18; entries are due April 30, and Kroto and I are judges. Scientific American has been a partner since the fair's launch in 2011, and sponsors the $50,000 Science in Action award. (Read about the first Science in Action winner, in 2012, by 14-year-old Sakhiwe Shongwe and Bonkhe Mahlalela of Swaziland.) Joining Harry (as he prefers to be called) and me on today's Hangout were Krizia Lopez, a student at Columbia University and a Google Student Ambassador who shares a love of combining science and art, and Shree Bose, a student at Harvard University and the grand prize winner of the first Google Science fair in 2011. The video is below. Look for more scientist Hangouts on the Google Science Fair Google+ page.  

Mariette DiChristina, Steering Group chair, is dean and professor of the practice in journalism at the Boston University College of Communication. She was formerly editor in chief of Scientific American and executive vice president, Magazines, for Springer Nature.

More by Mariette DiChristina

It’s Time to Stand Up for Science

If you enjoyed this article, I’d like to ask for your support. Scientific American has served as an advocate for science and industry for 180 years, and right now may be the most critical moment in that two-century history.

I’ve been a Scientific American subscriber since I was 12 years old, and it helped shape the way I look at the world. SciAm always educates and delights me, and inspires a sense of awe for our vast, beautiful universe. I hope it does that for you, too.

If you subscribe to Scientific American, you help ensure that our coverage is centered on meaningful research and discovery; that we have the resources to report on the decisions that threaten labs across the U.S.; and that we support both budding and working scientists at a time when the value of science itself too often goes unrecognized.

In return, you get essential news, captivating podcasts, brilliant infographics, can't-miss newsletters, must-watch videos, challenging games, and the science world's best writing and reporting. You can even gift someone a subscription.

There has never been a more important time for us to stand up and show why science matters. I hope you’ll support us in that mission.

Thank you,

David M. Ewalt, Editor in Chief, Scientific American

Subscribe