Physics, Metaphysics and Cosmology Collide in New E-Book, Possibilities in Parallel: Seeking the Multiverse

Join Our Community of Science Lovers!

This article was published in Scientific American’s former blog network and reflects the views of the author, not necessarily those of Scientific American



On supporting science journalism

If you're enjoying this article, consider supporting our award-winning journalism by subscribing. By purchasing a subscription you are helping to ensure the future of impactful stories about the discoveries and ideas shaping our world today.


[caption id="attachment_1263" align="alignright" width="220" caption="Possibilities in Parallel: Seeking the Multiverse"]
[/caption] Parallel universes are a staple of science fiction, and it's no wonder. They allow us to explore the question, "What if?" in a way that lets us step completely outside of the world we know, rather than question how that world might have turned out differently. For cosmologists, the question isn't "What if the South won the Civil War?" but "What if the constants that make up the fundamental building blocks of physics were different?" Physicists argue that any slight change in the laws of physics would mean a disruption of the universe's evolution, and thus our existence. Take gravity, for example: too strong and stars would burn through their fuel far more quickly. If the universe had expanded too fast, matter would spread out too thin for galaxies to form. The list of examples goes on--to the point where the laws of physics might seem, dare we say, designed to make our existence possible. Short of a divine or supernatural explanation, one scientific possibility is that our universe isn't the only one. That's the idea explored in this e-Book, Possibilities in Parallel: Seeking the Multiverse. In section 1 we explore why scientists think other universes could exist. After that we get a look at the implications. Is it possible to have life in a universe with different physical laws? It would seem so. In "Cracking Open a Window," Scientific American contributing editor George Musser discusses the possibility that our universe has more than three spatial dimensions--the others just happen to be very small. Other articles, including "The Universe's Unseen Dimensions," analyze the idea that our universe is one of many "branes"--three-dimensional structures stretched out over a higher-dimensional space. The concept of a parallel universe also touches time travel, and articles like David Deutsch's and Michael Lockwood's "The Quantum Physics of Time Travel" discuss the treatments of quantum theory that allow for it. It's a triumph of the sciences that the very question of why the universe looks as it does can be asked at all. There are currently several possibilities for a multiverse, if it exists. Time and a lot of scientific spadework will reveal which one is right--and get us closer to answering those metaphysical questions: What if? Why us? Why now?

It’s Time to Stand Up for Science

If you enjoyed this article, I’d like to ask for your support. Scientific American has served as an advocate for science and industry for 180 years, and right now may be the most critical moment in that two-century history.

I’ve been a Scientific American subscriber since I was 12 years old, and it helped shape the way I look at the world. SciAm always educates and delights me, and inspires a sense of awe for our vast, beautiful universe. I hope it does that for you, too.

If you subscribe to Scientific American, you help ensure that our coverage is centered on meaningful research and discovery; that we have the resources to report on the decisions that threaten labs across the U.S.; and that we support both budding and working scientists at a time when the value of science itself too often goes unrecognized.

In return, you get essential news, captivating podcasts, brilliant infographics, can't-miss newsletters, must-watch videos, challenging games, and the science world's best writing and reporting. You can even gift someone a subscription.

There has never been a more important time for us to stand up and show why science matters. I hope you’ll support us in that mission.

Thank you,

David M. Ewalt, Editor in Chief, Scientific American

Subscribe