Crushed comets give star a dusty belt

Join Our Community of Science Lovers!

This article was published in Scientific American’s former blog network and reflects the views of the author, not necessarily those of Scientific American


Two thousand comets a day collide around nearby star Fomalhaut creating a continually replenished dust belt in the outskirts of the star's system, according to a new paper recently published in the journal Astronomy & Astrophysics.

Fomalhaut is a young star. It is twice as massive as the sun and sits 25 light years away from us. In the 1980s, astronomers discovered that it was surrounded by large amounts of dust. The Herschel Space Observatory has now produced the best ever far-infrared images of the star system and given a team of astronomers lead by Bram Acke at the University of Leuven in Belgium chance to take a fresh look at the system.

Most intriguing is a narrow belt of dust and debris in the outer edges of the Fomalhaut system, that is a bit like the solar system's own Kuiper belt. Fomalhaut's belt is 140 times further from the star than the Earth is from the sun. The dust particles that fill it have temperatures between -170C and -230C.


On supporting science journalism

If you're enjoying this article, consider supporting our award-winning journalism by subscribing. By purchasing a subscription you are helping to ensure the future of impactful stories about the discoveries and ideas shaping our world today.


In our solar system, the Kuiper belt includes Pluto and two other dwarf planets but mostly consists of smaller icy objects left over from the formation of the solar system. Belts like this tend to exist in planetary systems at locations where, for one reason or another, no planets formed. Fomalhaut's belt is much younger than the Kuiper belt, though. And it is more active too. The Fomalhaut system resembles our solar system in its most active phase, says Acke.

The belt is off-centre with respect to its star, hinting at one or more planets close by interacting with it via gravity. The narrowness of the belt, confirmed by the new Herschel observations, also points to planets nearby that keep the dust and debris in place and stopping it spreading out.

But that's not the most interesting thing about Fomalhaut. Neither is the existence of a dusty disk around the star – they are probably as common as planets (which are very common indeed). "What makes Fomalhaut special is the presence of large amounts of very small dust," says Acke.

Dust in Fomalhaut's narrow belt absorbs light as if it were made of tiny particles, micrometers across, according to the new Herschel observations of the dust grains' "glow". But previous Hubble observations saw the dust belt reflect light as if it were made of much larger grains.

To resolve this, Acke and his colleagues suggest that the grains that fill Fomalhaut's belt are "fluffy". That is, they are small, as Herschel shows, but clump together loosely and reflect light as if they were bigger.

But there was another problem: small grains like those in Fomalhaut's belt should get blown out of the system by strong winds from the star. Larger grains have enough gravitational staying power to resist getting blown away, but smaller ones do not. That there are still small grains in the belt suggests that they are being constantly replenished somehow.

The "fluffy" nature of the particles pointed to comets as the source of the dust, says Acke. So, along with his colleagues, he calculated how many comets would need to be destroyed to keep the belt full of tiny dust particles. "From the amount of small particles, we deduced that 2000 [1km-sized] comets are reduced to dust each day," he says.

Kelly Oakes has a master's degree in science communication and a degree in physics, both from Imperial College London. She started this blog so she could share some amazing stories about space, astrophysics, particle physics and more with other people, and partly so she could explore those stories herself.

More by Kelly Oakes

It’s Time to Stand Up for Science

If you enjoyed this article, I’d like to ask for your support. Scientific American has served as an advocate for science and industry for 180 years, and right now may be the most critical moment in that two-century history.

I’ve been a Scientific American subscriber since I was 12 years old, and it helped shape the way I look at the world. SciAm always educates and delights me, and inspires a sense of awe for our vast, beautiful universe. I hope it does that for you, too.

If you subscribe to Scientific American, you help ensure that our coverage is centered on meaningful research and discovery; that we have the resources to report on the decisions that threaten labs across the U.S.; and that we support both budding and working scientists at a time when the value of science itself too often goes unrecognized.

In return, you get essential news, captivating podcasts, brilliant infographics, can't-miss newsletters, must-watch videos, challenging games, and the science world's best writing and reporting. You can even gift someone a subscription.

There has never been a more important time for us to stand up and show why science matters. I hope you’ll support us in that mission.

Thank you,

David M. Ewalt, Editor in Chief, Scientific American

Subscribe