Food Safety: A Job for 10-Year-Olds?

Join Our Community of Science Lovers!

This article was published in Scientific American’s former blog network and reflects the views of the author, not necessarily those of Scientific American


Earlier this month, I watched groups of kids ages 9 to 16 present their own original ideas for solving major food safety problems. They were participating in the annual First Lego League challenge, the robotics competition founded by inventor Dean Kamen and Lego. We heard ideas for better ways of monitoring the pH level of water used to raise farmed salmon and another idea for sorting safe, raw oysters from those contaminated with the bacterium Vibrio vulnificus using a conveyor belt equipped with a sensor and a robotic arm.

The competition has three components: a research component, where students identify a problem within a broader theme, investigate it, and come up with a solution that they present to a panel of judges; a robot-building component that involves programming a Lego Mindstorms robot to navigate a series of obstacle courses (shown above), and adherence to the First Lego code of conduct that includes presenting your research to the community, whether it's in church, in school or to family and friends.


On supporting science journalism

If you're enjoying this article, consider supporting our award-winning journalism by subscribing. By purchasing a subscription you are helping to ensure the future of impactful stories about the discoveries and ideas shaping our world today.


One of the teams I met were the GearHawks of PS 399 in East Flatbush, Brooklyn. They attended a scrimmage organized by the New York Academy of Sciences, which mentors teams from schools that might not otherwise have the resources to participate in the competition. At the scrimmage, NYAS-sponsored teams faced off against a crossection of teams from public and private schools across New York City and surrounding areas.

Here's Nigel Wardally, 10, of the GearHawks explaining his oyster project, with teammate Maximus Britton, also 10, in the background. It's hard to hear him over the din in the background, but in the end he points out that V. vulnificus is a flesh-eating microbe:

And here's their robot on the obstacle course. This robot is not related to the conveyor belt system they thought of for their oyster project, but it is navigating an obstacle course with a food safety theme:

It's too late to sign up for the contest this year, but next fall’s project sounds equally interesting: ideas for improving quality of life for seniors.

 

Anna Kuchment is a contributing editor at Scientific American and a staff science reporter at the Dallas Morning News. She is also co-author of a forthcoming book about earthquakes triggered by energy production.

More by Anna Kuchment

It’s Time to Stand Up for Science

If you enjoyed this article, I’d like to ask for your support. Scientific American has served as an advocate for science and industry for 180 years, and right now may be the most critical moment in that two-century history.

I’ve been a Scientific American subscriber since I was 12 years old, and it helped shape the way I look at the world. SciAm always educates and delights me, and inspires a sense of awe for our vast, beautiful universe. I hope it does that for you, too.

If you subscribe to Scientific American, you help ensure that our coverage is centered on meaningful research and discovery; that we have the resources to report on the decisions that threaten labs across the U.S.; and that we support both budding and working scientists at a time when the value of science itself too often goes unrecognized.

In return, you get essential news, captivating podcasts, brilliant infographics, can't-miss newsletters, must-watch videos, challenging games, and the science world's best writing and reporting. You can even gift someone a subscription.

There has never been a more important time for us to stand up and show why science matters. I hope you’ll support us in that mission.

Thank you,

David M. Ewalt, Editor in Chief, Scientific American

Subscribe