Art of the Living Dead

Join Our Community of Science Lovers!

This article was published in Scientific American’s former blog network and reflects the views of the author, not necessarily those of Scientific American


Swarms of army ants naturally inspire fear, of course, but to people who know ants this painting is even more terrifying.

Hashime Murayama has not only drawn army ants, but undead army ants, their reanimated corpses lurching towards us in eerie procession. The bodies rigid, antennae jarringly askew, these ants are clearly chasing us from beyond the grave. Spooky! And, unintentional.

Murayama, like most scientific illustrators of his time, drew from preserved museum specimens. With no easy way to verify the animals' natural posture, the resulting paintings depict contorted, dying animals.


On supporting science journalism

If you're enjoying this article, consider supporting our award-winning journalism by subscribing. By purchasing a subscription you are helping to ensure the future of impactful stories about the discoveries and ideas shaping our world today.


Consider an Australian bull ant:

Of course, paintings based on a pinned specimen will look much as Murayama's does:

Older natural history art is often a bit off. We can't really blame the artists, though. It's not like an early century museum illustrator could just pop down to Australia to observe live bull ants, or check youtube for a pertinent video. Instead, we enjoy the art for what it tell us of the natural history of illustration, rather than of natural history itself.

Plus, zombies.

 

[copyright note: My reproduction of Murayama's work is intended as Fair Use editorial commentary on the paintings]

Alex Wild is Curator of Entomology at the University of Texas at Austin, where he studies the evolutionary history of ants. In 2003 he founded a photography business as an aesthetic complement to his scientific work, and his natural history photographs appear in numerous museums, books and media outlets.

More by Alex Wild

It’s Time to Stand Up for Science

If you enjoyed this article, I’d like to ask for your support. Scientific American has served as an advocate for science and industry for 180 years, and right now may be the most critical moment in that two-century history.

I’ve been a Scientific American subscriber since I was 12 years old, and it helped shape the way I look at the world. SciAm always educates and delights me, and inspires a sense of awe for our vast, beautiful universe. I hope it does that for you, too.

If you subscribe to Scientific American, you help ensure that our coverage is centered on meaningful research and discovery; that we have the resources to report on the decisions that threaten labs across the U.S.; and that we support both budding and working scientists at a time when the value of science itself too often goes unrecognized.

In return, you get essential news, captivating podcasts, brilliant infographics, can't-miss newsletters, must-watch videos, challenging games, and the science world's best writing and reporting. You can even gift someone a subscription.

There has never been a more important time for us to stand up and show why science matters. I hope you’ll support us in that mission.

Thank you,

David M. Ewalt, Editor in Chief, Scientific American

Subscribe