Fill Flash Balances Foreground with Backdrop

Join Our Community of Science Lovers!

This article was published in Scientific American’s former blog network and reflects the views of the author, not necessarily those of Scientific American


Here's a simple image of a bug on a branch:

Appearances aside, producing this image was technically more challenging than my usual fare. Both the sky and the insect are properly exposed, meaning I essentially had to plan and meter for two photographs in one exposure.

Consider the scene with only natural sunlight and the camera metered for the sky:


On supporting science journalism

If you're enjoying this article, consider supporting our award-winning journalism by subscribing. By purchasing a subscription you are helping to ensure the future of impactful stories about the discoveries and ideas shaping our world today.


To correct for the dark, underexposed bug I added foreground light in the form of a diffused radio-triggered flash. Thus, the full process behind the top photo was as follows:

  1. Set bug on a stick with an off-camera strobe positioned nearby (just off-frame to the top-left).

  2. Arrange orientation so that sunlight backlights the bug, highlighting its outline.

  3. Set aperture for desired depth-of-field (f/16).

  4. Metering on sky, adjust ISO (200) and shutter speed (1/200 sec) to expose backdrop for the desired shade of blue.

  5. Manually adjust fill flash until the bug is properly exposed (Canon 55o EX strobe at 1/32 power).

Although these mixed ambient/strobe shots take additional preparation, they result in photographs that show both the insect and its environment.

 

Alex Wild is Curator of Entomology at the University of Texas at Austin, where he studies the evolutionary history of ants. In 2003 he founded a photography business as an aesthetic complement to his scientific work, and his natural history photographs appear in numerous museums, books and media outlets.

More by Alex Wild

It’s Time to Stand Up for Science

If you enjoyed this article, I’d like to ask for your support. Scientific American has served as an advocate for science and industry for 180 years, and right now may be the most critical moment in that two-century history.

I’ve been a Scientific American subscriber since I was 12 years old, and it helped shape the way I look at the world. SciAm always educates and delights me, and inspires a sense of awe for our vast, beautiful universe. I hope it does that for you, too.

If you subscribe to Scientific American, you help ensure that our coverage is centered on meaningful research and discovery; that we have the resources to report on the decisions that threaten labs across the U.S.; and that we support both budding and working scientists at a time when the value of science itself too often goes unrecognized.

In return, you get essential news, captivating podcasts, brilliant infographics, can't-miss newsletters, must-watch videos, challenging games, and the science world's best writing and reporting. You can even gift someone a subscription.

There has never been a more important time for us to stand up and show why science matters. I hope you’ll support us in that mission.

Thank you,

David M. Ewalt, Editor in Chief, Scientific American

Subscribe