Reader Photo: The Python's Shape

Join Our Community of Science Lovers!

This article was published in Scientific American’s former blog network and reflects the views of the author, not necessarily those of Scientific American


I love this simple shot, submitted by herpetological photographer Stephen Zozaya.

In fact, I like the photo so much I'll use it to illustrate a general point about photographic composition. Stephen took several pictures, including this one:

Of the series, it is the top photo that grabs our attention, even though the others are properly exposed and focused. Why?


On supporting science journalism

If you're enjoying this article, consider supporting our award-winning journalism by subscribing. By purchasing a subscription you are helping to ensure the future of impactful stories about the discoveries and ideas shaping our world today.


Consider a distillation of both images into simple silhouettes:

Images work most effectively when the subject's basic shape stands out. The first silhouette is clearly visible as a coiled snake, but the second is buried amid background clutter. We see with our brains as much as we see with our eyes, and our brains work harder to make sense of the second image, diminishing its relative impact.

This silhouette rule is a principle long recognized by graphic artists:

When we view objects, especially moving objects, our brains tend to break them down not into a collection of varying hues, but rather silhouettes. Quick object identification is a primal evolutionary necessity, and it’s a foundational way our visual interpretation works.

When an object’s silhouette is difficult to make out, we have a tough time keeping track of what we’re seeing. It’s why so many comics and drawings use the visual shorthand out outlining figures and objects. The shades and values of an object are secondary to the basic shape when it comes to recognition. As such, effectively managing silhouettes is a vital tool for visual narratives.

-Aaron Diaz, author of "Dresden Codak"

Photographers are obviously constrained by the reality of the scene in front of the lens. As Stephen's lovely green python demonstrates, however, they do best when respecting the silhouette rule.

[If you'd like to submit a reader photo for Compound Eye, leave a link in the comments below]

Alex Wild is Curator of Entomology at the University of Texas at Austin, where he studies the evolutionary history of ants. In 2003 he founded a photography business as an aesthetic complement to his scientific work, and his natural history photographs appear in numerous museums, books and media outlets.

More by Alex Wild

It’s Time to Stand Up for Science

If you enjoyed this article, I’d like to ask for your support. Scientific American has served as an advocate for science and industry for 180 years, and right now may be the most critical moment in that two-century history.

I’ve been a Scientific American subscriber since I was 12 years old, and it helped shape the way I look at the world. SciAm always educates and delights me, and inspires a sense of awe for our vast, beautiful universe. I hope it does that for you, too.

If you subscribe to Scientific American, you help ensure that our coverage is centered on meaningful research and discovery; that we have the resources to report on the decisions that threaten labs across the U.S.; and that we support both budding and working scientists at a time when the value of science itself too often goes unrecognized.

In return, you get essential news, captivating podcasts, brilliant infographics, can't-miss newsletters, must-watch videos, challenging games, and the science world's best writing and reporting. You can even gift someone a subscription.

There has never been a more important time for us to stand up and show why science matters. I hope you’ll support us in that mission.

Thank you,

David M. Ewalt, Editor in Chief, Scientific American

Subscribe