The unseen cost of the internet sharing culture

“If you don’t want people to share your photo, don’t put it on the internet.” -vast numbers of people on the internet, 1995-2013 This refrain is among the most common threads in the great internet copyright wars.

Join Our Community of Science Lovers!

This article was published in Scientific American’s former blog network and reflects the views of the author, not necessarily those of Scientific American


"If you don't want people to share your photo, don't put it on the internet."

-vast numbers of people on the internet, 1995-2013

This refrain is among the most common threads in the great internet copyright wars. It's a facile argument for its ignorance of 3rd party uploads and of the blind resharing of photos tagged "attribution required" at upload, but I digress. Correct or not, the fact that internet content is so often copied without credit carries its own chilling effect on what gets posted.

With too many people unwilling to credit or pay photographers for their services, many photographers actually do follow the above advice. Some post nothing at all, or only upload small samples of their full portfolios.


On supporting science journalism

If you're enjoying this article, consider supporting our award-winning journalism by subscribing. By purchasing a subscription you are helping to ensure the future of impactful stories about the discoveries and ideas shaping our world today.


The relative secrecy of these visual artists is a shame. Some of the unshared work I've seen in person is aesthetically spectacular, or scientifically informative, or both. And the losers in this situation are us, the users of the internet, because we will never see the amazing work not shared.

Alex Wild is Curator of Entomology at the University of Texas at Austin, where he studies the evolutionary history of ants. In 2003 he founded a photography business as an aesthetic complement to his scientific work, and his natural history photographs appear in numerous museums, books and media outlets.

More by Alex Wild

It’s Time to Stand Up for Science

If you enjoyed this article, I’d like to ask for your support. Scientific American has served as an advocate for science and industry for 180 years, and right now may be the most critical moment in that two-century history.

I’ve been a Scientific American subscriber since I was 12 years old, and it helped shape the way I look at the world. SciAm always educates and delights me, and inspires a sense of awe for our vast, beautiful universe. I hope it does that for you, too.

If you subscribe to Scientific American, you help ensure that our coverage is centered on meaningful research and discovery; that we have the resources to report on the decisions that threaten labs across the U.S.; and that we support both budding and working scientists at a time when the value of science itself too often goes unrecognized.

In return, you get essential news, captivating podcasts, brilliant infographics, can't-miss newsletters, must-watch videos, challenging games, and the science world's best writing and reporting. You can even gift someone a subscription.

There has never been a more important time for us to stand up and show why science matters. I hope you’ll support us in that mission.

Thank you,

David M. Ewalt, Editor in Chief, Scientific American

Subscribe