Thrifty Thursday: Army Ants Filmed on a Budget

Join Our Community of Science Lovers!

This article was published in Scientific American’s former blog network and reflects the views of the author, not necessarily those of Scientific American


Thrifty Thursdays feature photographs movies taken with equipment costing less than $500.

[Panasonic Lumix DMC-ZS3 - $241; Glidetrack shooter - $276]


On supporting science journalism

If you're enjoying this article, consider supporting our award-winning journalism by subscribing. By purchasing a subscription you are helping to ensure the future of impactful stories about the discoveries and ideas shaping our world today.


I often fill the Thrifty Thursday slot with still photographs from my trusty Panasonic digicam. As much as I like the camera for snapshots, though, I actually bought it for video. This clip was edited down from about 15 minutes of footage of Eciton burchellii army ants returning from a raid.

I first attempted to film these ants with my heavier and more expensive Canon 7D dSLR. It didn't work. The 7D was too cumbersome to maneuver easily around the excitable army ants, and in many places there simply wasn't enough light to have any reasonable depth of field. The nimble digicam, on the other hand, gave plenty of focal depth even in dimmer light. I was impressed.

The bit where the camera slides along a tree root covered with running ants was done with the incredible Glidetrack shooter. I highly, highly recommend the Glidetrack. The ability to glide smoothly through a scene can transform any project into a professional-looking video, even if you're filming only with a consumer point-and-shoot.

Looking at current equipment prices, I'm a few dollars over $500 for this one. In my defense, I purchased my Glidetrack shooter for only $150 a couple years back. This must have been before everyone realized just what an amazing bargain it was.

Alex Wild is Curator of Entomology at the University of Texas at Austin, where he studies the evolutionary history of ants. In 2003 he founded a photography business as an aesthetic complement to his scientific work, and his natural history photographs appear in numerous museums, books and media outlets.

More by Alex Wild

It’s Time to Stand Up for Science

If you enjoyed this article, I’d like to ask for your support. Scientific American has served as an advocate for science and industry for 180 years, and right now may be the most critical moment in that two-century history.

I’ve been a Scientific American subscriber since I was 12 years old, and it helped shape the way I look at the world. SciAm always educates and delights me, and inspires a sense of awe for our vast, beautiful universe. I hope it does that for you, too.

If you subscribe to Scientific American, you help ensure that our coverage is centered on meaningful research and discovery; that we have the resources to report on the decisions that threaten labs across the U.S.; and that we support both budding and working scientists at a time when the value of science itself too often goes unrecognized.

In return, you get essential news, captivating podcasts, brilliant infographics, can't-miss newsletters, must-watch videos, challenging games, and the science world's best writing and reporting. You can even gift someone a subscription.

There has never been a more important time for us to stand up and show why science matters. I hope you’ll support us in that mission.

Thank you,

David M. Ewalt, Editor in Chief, Scientific American

Subscribe