Cuddly bacteria

Join Our Community of Science Lovers!

This article was published in Scientific American’s former blog network and reflects the views of the author, not necessarily those of Scientific American


Humble felt seems to be undergoing a bit of a crafty renaissance at the moment. Events in London include the monthly 'Get Felt Up' in the trendy Shoreditch area of London. If it's okay for the trendsters, it's okay for us too. Two Creatology writers, Joseph and Christine, visited the Drink, Shop & Do cafe in London's King's Cross for a night of making our own cuddly bacteria out of felt, sequins and wool. The evening was organised by Science London. Whose bacteria would be the best-looking? Would either of them win the evening's prize (a cocktail)? Would anyone know the answers to the quiz? Would drinking wine impede the ability to glean any new facts about bacteria?

To find out the answer to all this, and more, read on. But first a quick guide to making your own (probably not suitable for small children on account of the stuck-on sequins).

You'll need: Some felt, some wool or thick thread, some craft glue, some sequins, some newspaper to stuff your bacterium with, and some imagination. Let's go!


On supporting science journalism

If you're enjoying this article, consider supporting our award-winning journalism by subscribing. By purchasing a subscription you are helping to ensure the future of impactful stories about the discoveries and ideas shaping our world today.


1. Cut out your bacterium shape from felt. Round for staphylococcus, rod-shaped like salmonella or waved for the spiral-shaped Treponema pallidum that causes syphilis. I opted to make a squeezy staphylococcus.

2. Sew or stick on some wool string or cut up felt for the DNA. For DNA, bacteria tend to have one circular chromosome all ruched up and squiggly [there's quite a good illustration of bacterial DNA here]. Bacteria don't have a nucleus so go wild with that DNA and put those squiggles everywhere.

Add some plasmids if you want. They are little circular bits of DNA that aren't as important as the main chromosome. Otherwise known as more wool or felt.

3. Go crazy and stick some sequin ribosomes on your bacteria. In case you didn't know, ribosomes translate genetic code from DNA into amino acids, which make up proteins.

4. Sew the felty bacterium together at its edges and stuff it with some ripped up newspaper before you sew it up the whole way.

5. Add some whip-like tails called flagella, or hair-like fimbrae or pili.

6. Add any other decorations? A face maybe? It's your bacterium after all.

That's it. And now for the moment of truth. I can reveal that Joseph won with his handcrafted Clostridium. Creatology FTW! "They are straight rods - purple under a Gram stain and are peritrichous - i.e. they have flagella uniformly distributed over the surface of the cell," explains Creatology's Joseph. Gram staining is a method for identifying and classifying bacteria, turning bacteria with a thick peptidoglaycan layer in their cell walls violet - those with only a thin layer don't stain. Note that Joe's bacterium (below) has purple edges and flagella to show that the Clostridium is Gram positive. I feel sure that it was Joseph's craft-skillery and knowledge-geekery that resulted in his triumph.

So... it was fun. But did we learn anything?

Joseph says: "It was a great way of learning about bacteria - I will now never forget what Clostridia are like, because I spent several hours stitching one together."

As well as an instruction sheet with facts there was also a bacteria general knowledge quiz. I think that the quiz served to highlight what I didn't know about bacteria as much as what I did. Which is useful because it teaches you not to assume you know anything when you haven't studied biology since the age of 16. Overall, I think you would have to be at least mildly interested in science (and not just the cocktails at the bar) to want to attend an event like this. But even those that have graduated in microbiology can just have fun creating their own cuddly bacterium.

What do you think: Are these kinds of events useful for getting lay people engaged in science?

Christine Ottery is a journalist with a very broad range interests and a MA in science journalism from City University. In the past year she has written about art and science for the New Scientist, technology for Wired UK, neuroscience for the Dana Foundation, international development for SciDev.net, 'the female Viagra' for Comment is Free, and the environment for TheEcologist.co.uk and the Guardian. On top of all this, Christine has been known to blog, tweet, present podcasts, deliver talks and film and produce for online broadcast.

More by Christine Ottery

Subscribe to Support Independent Journalism

Great science journalism requires human expertise, time, effort and creativity. And it costs money. That’s why I and the journalists here at Scientific American hope you’ll join our community.

When you subscribe, you are supporting staff and freelance journalists who are passionate about telling science stories that are true, important and compelling. Our editors and reporters are often experts in their fields, which means they understand the nuances of big discoveries and can untangle the breakthroughs from the hype. With a subscription, you are also supporting rigorous fact-checking to ensure the words we publish are precise and accurate. And you’re supporting original illustrations, graphics and photos that bring you closer to an advanced laboratory, an ice sheet in Antarctica or a space mission in orbit. You’re helping us craft other types of high-quality journalism as well: Our newsletters are carefully written, edited and curated by staffers you have or will come to know and love. Our Science Quickly podcast is based on original reporting, collaboration with editors and scientists and exacting production.

Subscriptions keep this engine running so we can continue to deliver thoughtful, rigorous and independent science journalism to you. In an era of viral misinformation, this work is crucial. If you value what we do, I hope you’ll consider joining us as a subscriber

Thank you,

Jeanna Bryner, Editor in Chief, Scientific American

Subscribe