It from Bit or Bit from It? Announcing the 5th Foundational Questions Institute Essay Contest

Join Our Community of Science Lovers!

This article was published in Scientific American’s former blog network and reflects the views of the author, not necessarily those of Scientific American



On supporting science journalism

If you're enjoying this article, consider supporting our award-winning journalism by subscribing. By purchasing a subscription you are helping to ensure the future of impactful stories about the discoveries and ideas shaping our world today.


What a great way to start the week: the Foundational Questions Institute has just announced its fifth essay contest. The topic is the physics of information. It could hardly be more timely, and not just because of the cultural Zeitgeist. Going to a physics conference these days is like landing in The Village of the old TV series The Prisoner, where all anyone talks about is information. Information theory makes sense of the Second Law of thermodynamics and much of the formalism of quantum mechanics. Black holes are bad ass not because they destroy matter per se, but because they destroy information. The holographic principle holds that the universe has an unexpectedly limited capacity to store and process information, perhaps indicating that space and time are not fundamental ingredients of nature, but derived from some deeper level. Might information be more basic than the material things that carry it? As physicist John Wheeler famously put it, can we get "it from bit"? Does that idea even make sense? Information is always information about something, isn't it? There is quite a knot of questions to disentangle. I expect that a Who's Who of physicists and philosophers will enter the contest, not to mention new voices with provocative ideas. Scientific American is a co-sponsor of the contest, which, in practical terms, means that one of the editors will serve on the official judging panel and the magazine will consider the top-placed winners for publication. The article by David Tong in December, "The Unquantum Quantum", came out of the third essay contest, "Is Reality Digital or Analog?" The editors are now considering essays from the fourth, "Which of Our Basic Physical Assumptions Are Wrong?" The contest will accept entries through the end of June. The fun part is that you don't need to submit an essay to participate. All the essays are available online for reading, remarking, and rating. FQXi uses the community ranking to short-list entries for the official judging panel, and the institute plans to announce the winners in October.

Subscribe to Support Independent Journalism

Great science journalism requires human expertise, time, effort and creativity. And it costs money. That’s why I and the journalists here at Scientific American hope you’ll join our community.

When you subscribe, you are supporting staff and freelance journalists who are passionate about telling science stories that are true, important and compelling. Our editors and reporters are often experts in their fields, which means they understand the nuances of big discoveries and can untangle the breakthroughs from the hype. With a subscription, you are also supporting rigorous fact-checking to ensure the words we publish are precise and accurate. And you’re supporting original illustrations, graphics and photos that bring you closer to an advanced laboratory, an ice sheet in Antarctica or a space mission in orbit. You’re helping us craft other types of high-quality journalism as well: Our newsletters are carefully written, edited and curated by staffers you have or will come to know and love. Our Science Quickly podcast is based on original reporting, collaboration with editors and scientists and exacting production.

Subscriptions keep this engine running so we can continue to deliver thoughtful, rigorous and independent science journalism to you. In an era of viral misinformation, this work is crucial. If you value what we do, I hope you’ll consider joining us as a subscriber

Thank you,

Jeanna Bryner, Editor in Chief, Scientific American

Subscribe