Meta-Post: Posts on Brain Implants

Cross-Check columns on brain implants and other technologies for manipulating minds

Andrzej Wojcicki Getty Images

Join Our Community of Science Lovers!

This article was published in Scientific American’s former blog network and reflects the views of the author, not necessarily those of Scientific American


Below are posts I’ve written for Scientific American on brain implants and other devices that can supposedly fix disabled brains and enhance healthy ones. Please let me know about missing stories, broken links or other problems. See also my book Mind-Body Problems, available online for free. -- John Horgan

Much-Hyped Brain-Implant Treatment for Depression Suffers Setback

Much-touted Deep-Brain-Stimulation Treatment for Depression Fails Another Trial


On supporting science journalism

If you're enjoying this article, consider supporting our award-winning journalism by subscribing. By purchasing a subscription you are helping to ensure the future of impactful stories about the discoveries and ideas shaping our world today.


Patient in Failed Depression-Implant Trial Tells His Painful Story

Journalists Offer Sharply Divergent Views of Brain Implants for Depression

Return of Electro-Cures Exposes Psychiatry's Weakness

Why Optogenetic Methods for Manipulating Brains Don’t Light Me Up

Why Optogenetics Doesn’t Light Me Up: The Sequel

Tribute to Jose Delgado, Legendary and Slightly Scary Pioneer of Mind Control

Bizarre Brain-Implant Experiment Sought to "Cure" Homosexuality

Do We Need Brain Implants to Keep Up with Robots?

Are Cyborg Warriors a Good Idea?

How Technology Can Make Valentine's Day Much, Much Better

The Forgotten Era of Brain Chips (Scientific American Magazine)

RELATED META-POSTS

Meta-Post: Posts on Mental Illness

Meta-Post: Posts on Buddhism and Meditation

Meta-Post: Posts on Psychedelics

Meta-Post: Posts on the Mind-Body Problem

It’s Time to Stand Up for Science

If you enjoyed this article, I’d like to ask for your support. Scientific American has served as an advocate for science and industry for 180 years, and right now may be the most critical moment in that two-century history.

I’ve been a Scientific American subscriber since I was 12 years old, and it helped shape the way I look at the world. SciAm always educates and delights me, and inspires a sense of awe for our vast, beautiful universe. I hope it does that for you, too.

If you subscribe to Scientific American, you help ensure that our coverage is centered on meaningful research and discovery; that we have the resources to report on the decisions that threaten labs across the U.S.; and that we support both budding and working scientists at a time when the value of science itself too often goes unrecognized.

In return, you get essential news, captivating podcasts, brilliant infographics, can't-miss newsletters, must-watch videos, challenging games, and the science world's best writing and reporting. You can even gift someone a subscription.

There has never been a more important time for us to stand up and show why science matters. I hope you’ll support us in that mission.

Thank you,

David M. Ewalt, Editor in Chief, Scientific American

Subscribe