Oliver Sacks on Stage Fright

Neurologist Oiver Sacks, a best-selling chronicler of disorders of the brain and mind, describes how he copes with stage fright.

Join Our Community of Science Lovers!

This article was published in Scientific American’s former blog network and reflects the views of the author, not necessarily those of Scientific American


Neurologist and best-selling author Oliver Sacks, about whom I’ve recently written two posts (here and here), has been a public figure for decades now. He has given countless lectures and interviews, including one at my school in 2008, when I asked him about his book Musicophilia and other topics. Sacks was nervous at the start of that event, although he soon relaxed and performed splendidly. I subsequently wrote him a letter to thank him—and to ask for his thoughts about stage fright, which once afflicted and still fascinates me. Sacks responded with characteristic eloquence:

On the matter of “stage fright” I am somewhat ignorant, despite (or because) I suffer from it myself - perhaps less than I did, but nonetheless significantly. That is to say, I find my heart is racing a bit, my palms sweat, and my fingers and toes get icy. But within a minute or two of actually facing the audience, I (nearly always) feel different - and start to enjoy myself. Though people sometimes recommend beta-blockers (or do I mean alpha-blockers) for the anxiety and the autonomic effects, I have never taken these - partly because I feel that this sort of tension, unpleasant though it is, is (for me, at least) a prerequisite of performing well. I do, however, need to be alone, or with a supportive and congenial presence, for half an hour or so before any talk or “performance.” I can't bear moving straight from a social situation to a performance one. My sentiments are exactly those of (the younger) Bragg:

"A good lecture is a tour de force; a good lecturer should be keyed up to a high pitch of nervous tension before it and limp and exhausted after it . . . If a sensitive lecturer is to give of his best, he must be left in peace for a period before the lecture starts. It is the refinement of cruelty to expect him to be social."


On supporting science journalism

If you're enjoying this article, consider supporting our award-winning journalism by subscribing. By purchasing a subscription you are helping to ensure the future of impactful stories about the discoveries and ideas shaping our world today.


And I find I need - as perhaps we all do - a strong basic structure, along with the freedom to improvise at any point.

Best, Oliver

It’s Time to Stand Up for Science

If you enjoyed this article, I’d like to ask for your support. Scientific American has served as an advocate for science and industry for 180 years, and right now may be the most critical moment in that two-century history.

I’ve been a Scientific American subscriber since I was 12 years old, and it helped shape the way I look at the world. SciAm always educates and delights me, and inspires a sense of awe for our vast, beautiful universe. I hope it does that for you, too.

If you subscribe to Scientific American, you help ensure that our coverage is centered on meaningful research and discovery; that we have the resources to report on the decisions that threaten labs across the U.S.; and that we support both budding and working scientists at a time when the value of science itself too often goes unrecognized.

In return, you get essential news, captivating podcasts, brilliant infographics, can't-miss newsletters, must-watch videos, challenging games, and the science world's best writing and reporting. You can even gift someone a subscription.

There has never been a more important time for us to stand up and show why science matters. I hope you’ll support us in that mission.

Thank you,

David M. Ewalt, Editor in Chief, Scientific American

Subscribe