Ten Most Amazing Science(ish) Stories of 2015!

In a desperate attempt to boost end-of-year page-views, a blogger lists his favorite posts of the year, which explore meditation, "electro-cures," Thomas Kuhn, war and other topics.

Join Our Community of Science Lovers!

This article was published in Scientific American’s former blog network and reflects the views of the author, not necessarily those of Scientific American


Clarification: These are all stories—or, more precisely, posts—that I’ve written for this blog, because I’m trying to boost my end-of-year traffic stats. If you want a list of the biggest science stories of 2015, look elsewhere. My headline says “amazing” because, as I reported recently, scientific hype is surging, and I must keep pace. “Science(ish)” acknowledges that some of my obsessions, as readers often point out, are only tangentially scientific. Finally, these are my favorite posts, not necessarily readers’. In fact, many readers overlooked or loathed these posts, which is precisely why I’m reposting them here. Happy New Year!

What a Science Writer Thinks about on His Morning Commute. A science writer commuting to work ponders brain implants, schizophrenia, Penrose tiles and God.

Can Integrated Information Theory Explain Consciousness? A radical new solution to the mind–body problem poses problems of its own.


On supporting science journalism

If you're enjoying this article, consider supporting our award-winning journalism by subscribing. By purchasing a subscription you are helping to ensure the future of impactful stories about the discoveries and ideas shaping our world today.


Science, History and Truth at the Faculty Club. A mathematician, historian, physicist and journalist yammer about scientific truth in this lightly fictionalized account.

Meta-Meditation: A Skeptic Meditates on Meditation. The media are touting meditation’s potential for treating everything from anxiety to AIDS, but strong, objective evidence is lacking.

Climate Change: Facts Versus Opinions. When it comes to climate change, can "facts" be distinguished from "opinions"?

Everyone, Even Jenny McCarthy, Has the Right to Challenge “Scientific Experts.” Non-scientists should never simply accept the prevailing scientific consensus, because scientists can be wrong.

Hype of “Feel-Good Gene” Makes Me Feel Bad. A prominent psychiatrist touts a dubious genetic claim in The New York Times.

Return of Electro-Cures: Symptom of Psychiatry's Crisis? TMS and other "electro-cures" for depression are becoming popular in spite of limited demonstrated effectiveness.

The Gould Effect: When a Science Journalist Dislikes a Scientist. If a journalist finds a scientist annnoying, that can complicate his assessment of the scientist's work.

Where Is Outcry Over Children Killed by U.S.-Led Forces? There can be no justification for the killing of children by U.S.-led forces in Syria, Iraq and other war zones since 9/11.

It’s Time to Stand Up for Science

If you enjoyed this article, I’d like to ask for your support. Scientific American has served as an advocate for science and industry for 180 years, and right now may be the most critical moment in that two-century history.

I’ve been a Scientific American subscriber since I was 12 years old, and it helped shape the way I look at the world. SciAm always educates and delights me, and inspires a sense of awe for our vast, beautiful universe. I hope it does that for you, too.

If you subscribe to Scientific American, you help ensure that our coverage is centered on meaningful research and discovery; that we have the resources to report on the decisions that threaten labs across the U.S.; and that we support both budding and working scientists at a time when the value of science itself too often goes unrecognized.

In return, you get essential news, captivating podcasts, brilliant infographics, can't-miss newsletters, must-watch videos, challenging games, and the science world's best writing and reporting. You can even gift someone a subscription.

There has never been a more important time for us to stand up and show why science matters. I hope you’ll support us in that mission.

Thank you,

David M. Ewalt, Editor in Chief, Scientific American

Subscribe