3 Ways Dogs Have Been `Consciously Uncoupling' Way Before Gwyneth

Some people get divorced. Gwyneth Paltrow and Chris Martin `consciously uncouple.' Fine. I don't know exactly what that means (and neither do you), but here's my take on how dogs have been `consciously uncoupling' way before Gwyneth and Chris even met: 1) Butt Sniffing Humans greet with handshakes and hugs, while dogs greet with head-to-head [...]

Join Our Community of Science Lovers!

This article was published in Scientific American’s former blog network and reflects the views of the author, not necessarily those of Scientific American


Some people get divorced. Gwyneth Paltrow and Chris Martin ‘consciously uncouple.’ Fine. I don’t know exactly what that means (and neither do you), but here’s my take on how dogs have been ‘consciously uncoupling’ way before Gwyneth and Chris even met:

1) Butt Sniffing

Humans greet with handshakes and hugs, while dogs greet with head-to-head and head-to-tail sniffing. Head-to-head usually precedes head-to-tail, and for good reason. Many dogs (particularly older ones) aren’t overjoyed for their anogenital region to get a thorough once-over, and one study found that when two dogs meet, the dog receiving the butt sniff is more likely to retreat, or break off the interaction, than the one doing the sniffing. Thus, ‘consciously uncoupling.’


On supporting science journalism

If you're enjoying this article, consider supporting our award-winning journalism by subscribing. By purchasing a subscription you are helping to ensure the future of impactful stories about the discoveries and ideas shaping our world today.


2) Keeping Things Separate

While the stereotype is that dogs are ready for more food, always, that’s not entirely accurate. A recent study found that dogs tended to prefer string cheese over baby carrots. The researchers then asked whether the dogs would prefer cheese alone, or the cheese accompanied by a piece of carrot. The dogs chose a singular piece of cheese over cheese plus carrot. Like Gwyneth and Chris assessing their marriage, dogs figured the two were better off separated. When dogs saw cheese plus carrot, they ‘consciously uncoupled’ the two, preferring that the cheese stand alone.

3) Death

Heartbroken. Devastated. Distraught. These words describe many of us after losing a companion animal, and some dogs are right there with us. Two separate owner surveys—one by the ASPCA in the mid-1990s and the other more recently from the RSPCA—found that some dogs show notable behavior changes when another animal in the home dies, such as “a reduction in food consumption, an increase in sleeping, [and] a decrease in vocalizations.” Other dogs did not show these changes, reminding us that, like Gwyneth and Chris, even dogs differ in how they ‘consciously uncouple’ following a death.

The next thing we need are studies on how dogs deal when owners call it quits, throw a divorce party, or like Gwyneth and Chris, ‘consciously uncouple.’

~~~

Image:Party Animals, Wendy via Flickr. Used with permission.

References

Bradshaw J.W.S. & Lea A.M. (1992). Dyadic Interactions Between Domestic Dogs, Anthrozoos: A Multidisciplinary Journal of The Interactions of People & Animals, 5 (4) 245-253. DOI: 10.2752/089279392787011287

Lou, J. (2014). Less is Sometimes More. The Bark

Pattison K.F. & Zentall T.R. (2014). Suboptimal choice by dogs: when less is better than more, Animal Cognition, DOI: 10.1007/s10071-014-0735-2

Schultz, J.L., Anreder. P & Zawistowski, S. Companion animal response to the loss of an animal companion. ASPCA Report.

Walker, J., Phillips, C. and Waran, N. (2013). Companion animal owners’ perceptions of their animal’s behavioural response to the loss of an animal companion. In: Proceedings, International Society for Anthrozoology, Chicago, IL.

It’s Time to Stand Up for Science

If you enjoyed this article, I’d like to ask for your support. Scientific American has served as an advocate for science and industry for 180 years, and right now may be the most critical moment in that two-century history.

I’ve been a Scientific American subscriber since I was 12 years old, and it helped shape the way I look at the world. SciAm always educates and delights me, and inspires a sense of awe for our vast, beautiful universe. I hope it does that for you, too.

If you subscribe to Scientific American, you help ensure that our coverage is centered on meaningful research and discovery; that we have the resources to report on the decisions that threaten labs across the U.S.; and that we support both budding and working scientists at a time when the value of science itself too often goes unrecognized.

In return, you get essential news, captivating podcasts, brilliant infographics, can't-miss newsletters, must-watch videos, challenging games, and the science world's best writing and reporting. You can even gift someone a subscription.

There has never been a more important time for us to stand up and show why science matters. I hope you’ll support us in that mission.

Thank you,

David M. Ewalt, Editor in Chief, Scientific American

Subscribe