Dog-Eared Reading (June 2014)

I had one of those `woe is me' moments in September 2013, lamenting that on top of my personal dog-related To-Do lists there is so much dog-related reading to take in each month–much of it covering canine science research.

Join Our Community of Science Lovers!

This article was published in Scientific American’s former blog network and reflects the views of the author, not necessarily those of Scientific American


I had one of those ‘woe is me’ moments in September 2013, lamenting that on top of my personal dog-related To-Do lists there is so much dog-related reading to take in each month--much of it covering canine science research. It often feels like I'll miss something, and it can be difficult to keep up with it all.

To save you from this fate, here’s what you should not miss in June 2014:

Do Dogs Get that Eureka! Feeling?


On supporting science journalism

If you're enjoying this article, consider supporting our award-winning journalism by subscribing. By purchasing a subscription you are helping to ensure the future of impactful stories about the discoveries and ideas shaping our world today.


Zazie Todd at @CompAnimalPsych

I Yawn for Your Love

Linda Case at @ScienceDogBlog

Service Animal Scams: A Growing Problem

Hal Herzog at @PsychToday@herzoghal

How Well Can Children Interpret a Dog's Emotional State?

Stanley Coren at @PsychToday

What the Pug is Going On?

Mia Cobb at @DoUBelieveInDog

Three Ways to Confuse a New Dog

Patricia McConnell at The Other End of the Leash

What Happens to the Animals Who Are Used to Treat People in Therapy?

Jason Goldman at @io9@jgold85

Why Genetics and Dog Training?

Jessica Hekman at @dogzombieblog

‘Love Hormone' Has Same Effect on Humans and Dogs

Virginia Morell at @sciencemagazine@VirginiaMorell

Flashback Friday: Worst Scientific Job Ever? Doggy Breath Odor Judge

@srslyscience at @DiscoverMag

What were your favorite canine science articles or blog posts this June 2014? Did I miss anything?

Image: Nicholas Lee Max_090412_61s; Flickr Creative Commons License

It’s Time to Stand Up for Science

If you enjoyed this article, I’d like to ask for your support. Scientific American has served as an advocate for science and industry for 180 years, and right now may be the most critical moment in that two-century history.

I’ve been a Scientific American subscriber since I was 12 years old, and it helped shape the way I look at the world. SciAm always educates and delights me, and inspires a sense of awe for our vast, beautiful universe. I hope it does that for you, too.

If you subscribe to Scientific American, you help ensure that our coverage is centered on meaningful research and discovery; that we have the resources to report on the decisions that threaten labs across the U.S.; and that we support both budding and working scientists at a time when the value of science itself too often goes unrecognized.

In return, you get essential news, captivating podcasts, brilliant infographics, can't-miss newsletters, must-watch videos, challenging games, and the science world's best writing and reporting. You can even gift someone a subscription.

There has never been a more important time for us to stand up and show why science matters. I hope you’ll support us in that mission.

Thank you,

David M. Ewalt, Editor in Chief, Scientific American

Subscribe