February Dog Roundup (Brains, an Identity Crisis, Undrinkables and More)

February might be a short month, but like every month, it was packed with a healthy dose of dog studies and dog news. In case you were hibernating, working, catching up on a good book (or True Detective!), taking care of a sick loved one or just not reading dog news, here's what you should [...]

Join Our Community of Science Lovers!

This article was published in Scientific American’s former blog network and reflects the views of the author, not necessarily those of Scientific American


February might be a short month, but like every month, it was packed with a healthy dose of dog studies and dog news. In case you were hibernating, working, catching up on a good book (or True Detective!), taking care of a sick loved one or just not reading dog news, here’s what you should check out:

Part 1. On Spot’s Terms

Spot’s Vision, Updated


On supporting science journalism

If you're enjoying this article, consider supporting our award-winning journalism by subscribing. By purchasing a subscription you are helping to ensure the future of impactful stories about the discoveries and ideas shaping our world today.


-> What the dog really saw, Malcolm Campbell (@m_m_campbell)

-> Cats and dogs may see in ultraviolet, Tanya Lewis (@tanyalewis314)

What’s on Spot’s Mind?

Oodles of coverage of a new dog fMRI study out of Hungary.

-> How voice tickles the dog brain, Virginia Hughes (@virginiahughes)

-> Your dog can tell from your voice if you're happy or sad, Joseph Stromberg (@josephstromberg)

-> Yes, dogs know how we feel, Virginia Morell (@VirginiaMorell)

-> Dogs' brain scans reveal vocal responses, Rebecca Morelle (@rebeccamorelle)

-> Brain scans show striking similarities between dogs and humans, Brandon Keim (@9brandon)

-> Looking at dog brains, Jessica Hekman on Greg Berns fMRI research (@dogzombieblog)

~~~

Part 2. Spot’s Identity Crisis

Spot = Place for Nuts?

-> A squirrel attempts to hide a nut in the fur of a Bernese mountain dog (HT @mikel_maria of Cats and Squirrels for pointing this out)

Part-Wolf Spots Need Help

-> Scientific approaches to enriching the lives of sanctuary wolves and wolf-dog “hybrids”, Lindsay Mehrkam

~~~

Part 3. Our Relationship With Spot(s)

Quantity or Quality of Relationship With Spot?

-> Is caring for animals good for young people's social development? Zazie Todd (@CompAnimalPsych)

Spot and the Kids

-> The kids are alright, Linda Case (Facebook)

-> Dogs and babies: Not always cute, Moi (@doubelieveindog -- an oldie but relevant)

Spot’s Welcome Home-Wag Raises Questions

-> Dogs welcoming soldiers home, Karen London (@The_Bark)

Big Spot, Small Spot

-> Small dog privileges? Yes or no?, Patricia McConnell (Facebook)

Spot #2: Second-Dog Syndrome

->My dogs do sensitive work. Will my new one let me down? Cat Warren (@Cat_Warren)

Maybe Spot Shouldn’t Drink That

-> Making antifreeze less deadly for pets, and people, Deborah Blum (@deborahblum)

~~~

Part 4. Spot Would Really Like These Products

-> The Foobler: What it is and why you might want to get one, Sophia Yin (@SophiaYin and @Foobler)

-> Why all pregnant women with dogs need a treat & train: A vet behaviorist’s view, Sophia Yin (@SophiaYin)

~~~

Part 5. Competitive Spots

-> Why Olympic snowboard judging is better than Westminster Dog Show judging, Hal Herzog (@herzoghal)

-> Mutts take Manhattan, Alexandra Horowitz (Facebook)

And finally bunnies doing agility, because bunnies!

See you in March!

Photo: Sukanto Debnath via Flickr Creative Commons

Subscribe to Support Independent Journalism

Great science journalism requires human expertise, time, effort and creativity. And it costs money. That’s why I and the journalists here at Scientific American hope you’ll join our community.

When you subscribe, you are supporting staff and freelance journalists who are passionate about telling science stories that are true, important and compelling. Our editors and reporters are often experts in their fields, which means they understand the nuances of big discoveries and can untangle the breakthroughs from the hype. With a subscription, you are also supporting rigorous fact-checking to ensure the words we publish are precise and accurate. And you’re supporting original illustrations, graphics and photos that bring you closer to an advanced laboratory, an ice sheet in Antarctica or a space mission in orbit. You’re helping us craft other types of high-quality journalism as well: Our newsletters are carefully written, edited and curated by staffers you have or will come to know and love. Our Science Quickly podcast is based on original reporting, collaboration with editors and scientists and exacting production.

Subscriptions keep this engine running so we can continue to deliver thoughtful, rigorous and independent science journalism to you. In an era of viral misinformation, this work is crucial. If you value what we do, I hope you’ll consider joining us as a subscriber

Thank you,

Jeanna Bryner, Editor in Chief, Scientific American

Subscribe