Game Boy, Pimples and Archie Comics: Before They Were Scientists

Tracking Cats. A Book of Common Ants. Want to meet the mites on your forehead or the bacteria in your armpits? Get all that and more at Your Wild Life.

Join Our Community of Science Lovers!

This article was published in Scientific American’s former blog network and reflects the views of the author, not necessarily those of Scientific American


Tracking Cats. A Book of Common Ants. Want to meet the mites on your forehead or the bacteria in your armpits? Get all that and more at Your Wild Life.

Your Wild Life (Twitter) is exactly what its name suggests: scientists, science communicators, students, and citizens exploring the ecology all around us. The familiar is subjected to real scientific inquiry so we can all learn where cats go when they leave the house, and what’s the bacteria in our bellybuttons.

In the interview series "Before They Were Scientists," Your Wild Life takes the white coat off scientists to find out what their lives were like in middle school. A sure-fire way to get me sweating! We learn that Amy Savage was into roller skating and watching insects; Danielle N. Lee wanted to be a medical doctor and often corrected other kids’ grammar; Caren Cooper met a very friendly Jane Goodall but was shoved aside by her bodyguard; and Daniel Solomon moved from New York City to Florida in 1950. Middle schoolers of 2014 and beyond are introduced to the many different paths to becoming a scientist or science communicator.


On supporting science journalism

If you're enjoying this article, consider supporting our award-winning journalism by subscribing. By purchasing a subscription you are helping to ensure the future of impactful stories about the discoveries and ideas shaping our world today.


As someone whose journey into science was indirect (see my first post, The Accidental Scientist), I jumped at the chance to be included in "Before They Were Scientists." My middle school self would never in a trillion years have imagined I’d be doing what I’m doing now. As a middle schooler, I thought the world revolved around my friends, Game Boy, Archie comics, Keanu Reeves and after-school snacks. I thought that science teachers had an evil streak and that scientists surely spent their time titrating while simultaneously looking through a microscope. In middle school I didn’t like measuring liquids, I broke cover slips, and I refused to light the Bunsen burner because fire was scary. My ideas of science began and ended with Professor Frink of The Simpsons. Science was clearly not for me. But I guess it is. You can read my "Before They Were Scientists" interview here.

Thanks to Lea Shell and the Your Wild Life team for including me in the series, and to Eleanor Spicer Rice of Buzz Hoot Roar and Verdant Word for recommending me. I don’t remember what’s going on in that photo of me and the bird.

It’s Time to Stand Up for Science

If you enjoyed this article, I’d like to ask for your support. Scientific American has served as an advocate for science and industry for 180 years, and right now may be the most critical moment in that two-century history.

I’ve been a Scientific American subscriber since I was 12 years old, and it helped shape the way I look at the world. SciAm always educates and delights me, and inspires a sense of awe for our vast, beautiful universe. I hope it does that for you, too.

If you subscribe to Scientific American, you help ensure that our coverage is centered on meaningful research and discovery; that we have the resources to report on the decisions that threaten labs across the U.S.; and that we support both budding and working scientists at a time when the value of science itself too often goes unrecognized.

In return, you get essential news, captivating podcasts, brilliant infographics, can't-miss newsletters, must-watch videos, challenging games, and the science world's best writing and reporting. You can even gift someone a subscription.

There has never been a more important time for us to stand up and show why science matters. I hope you’ll support us in that mission.

Thank you,

David M. Ewalt, Editor in Chief, Scientific American

Subscribe