The Dodo Resurrects the Dog’s “Guilty” Look

“I get it. Like you, I have known (and loved) dogs who have massacred pillows, invaded cabinets and made abstract art with toilet paper.

Join Our Community of Science Lovers!

This article was published in Scientific American’s former blog network and reflects the views of the author, not necessarily those of Scientific American


"I get it. Like you, I have known (and loved) dogs who have massacred pillows, invaded cabinets and made abstract art with toilet paper. I’ve felt confusion, disbelief, maybe even anger. And then, out of the corner of my eye, I spy the culprit with a downtrodden face, tail thumping on the ground. He knows he’s guilty.

The only problem is, it’s not what it seems. We’re duped. By ourselves."


On supporting science journalism

If you're enjoying this article, consider supporting our award-winning journalism by subscribing. By purchasing a subscription you are helping to ensure the future of impactful stories about the discoveries and ideas shaping our world today.


January 13, 2014 was a day of rebirth. It marked the resurrection of Raphus cucullatus, better known as the Dodo, a "mysterious bird we drove into extinction." It is commonly described as "grossly obese and stupid,” although the biological accuracy of these attributions is limited.

Now, The Dodo is an online start-up exploring "our fierce and fraught bond with animals broadly and enthusiastically." Led by Kerry Lauerman, Salon's former Editor-in-Chief, The Dodo plans to "celebrate animals, and not just laugh at them."

In this spirit, I joined The Dodo this weekend with Think Your Dog Has A "Guilty" Look? Think Again. The next time your dog misbehaves and “fesses up” with those big, sad eyes, think what the Dodo would say. It stinks to be misunderstood.

------

Photo: Doggie Portrait Session 1 via Andrew Morrell. Flickr Creative Commons

References

Hecht, J., Miklósi, Á, Gácsi, M. 2012. Behavioral assessment and owner perceptions of behaviors associated with guilt in dogs. Appl. Anim. Behav. Sci Science. 139, 134–142.

Horowitz, A. 2009. Disambiguating the “guilty look”: salient prompts to a familiar dog behaviour. Behav. Processes 81, 447–452.

McConnell, P. 2005. For the Love of a Dog: Understanding Emotion in You and Your Best Friend. Ballantine, New York.

Morris, P. H., Doe, C., Godsell, E. 2008. Secondary emotions in non-primate species? Behavioural reports and subjective claims by animal owners. Cogn. Emotion 22, 3–20.

Schenkel, R. 1967. Submission: Its features and functions in wolf and dog. Amer. Zool. 7, 319–329.

Vollmer, P.J. 1977. Do mischievous dogs reveal their “guilt”? Vet. Med., Small Anim. Clin. 72, 1002–1005.

Subscribe to Support Independent Journalism

Great science journalism requires human expertise, time, effort and creativity. And it costs money. That’s why I and the journalists here at Scientific American hope you’ll join our community.

When you subscribe, you are supporting staff and freelance journalists who are passionate about telling science stories that are true, important and compelling. Our editors and reporters are often experts in their fields, which means they understand the nuances of big discoveries and can untangle the breakthroughs from the hype. With a subscription, you are also supporting rigorous fact-checking to ensure the words we publish are precise and accurate. And you’re supporting original illustrations, graphics and photos that bring you closer to an advanced laboratory, an ice sheet in Antarctica or a space mission in orbit. You’re helping us craft other types of high-quality journalism as well: Our newsletters are carefully written, edited and curated by staffers you have or will come to know and love. Our Science Quickly podcast is based on original reporting, collaboration with editors and scientists and exacting production.

Subscriptions keep this engine running so we can continue to deliver thoughtful, rigorous and independent science journalism to you. In an era of viral misinformation, this work is crucial. If you value what we do, I hope you’ll consider joining us as a subscriber

Thank you,

Jeanna Bryner, Editor in Chief, Scientific American

Subscribe