How to decrease head cocking: Watch a dog behavior & cognition conference today

Join Our Community of Science Lovers!

This article was published in Scientific American’s former blog network and reflects the views of the author, not necessarily those of Scientific American


When I tell someone that I study dog behavior and cognition, the usual response is a cocked head and a smile ranging from incredibly wide and excited to incredibly confused and unsure. They heard the word dog, and (unless they are someone like Farhad Manjoo of Slate) they would love to talk about dogs, and particularly, their dog. But, study + dog + behavior + cognition? What? Today, Sunday, June 30th, you can see what that means for yourself.

Today marks the final day of #SPARCS2013, a three-day conference being held in Redmond, Washington but streaming live, for free, to any computer around the world. Today, you can have a first-hand look at actual canine research studies. Here are some of the topics that will be covered today:

  • Maybe you’ve heard that early life experiences are important for dogs, but what’s the research behind that statement? How do early life experiences affect brain growth and development, and what constitutes “early life”?


On supporting science journalism

If you're enjoying this article, consider supporting our award-winning journalism by subscribing. By purchasing a subscription you are helping to ensure the future of impactful stories about the discoveries and ideas shaping our world today.


  • Maybe you’ve heard (or thought) that certain dogs are “smart” or “not smart,” but how should dog smarts be measured in a species with sensory similarities more akin to Toucan Sam (“Follow your nose!”) than us primates? On what level might “smarts” appear similar between dogs and humans, and do any similarities suggest that the mechanisms behind the smarts are the same?

  • While some dogs can learn to detect and discriminate minute smells and molecular compositions, how do dogs come to use or develop that capability? What is the olfactory experience of the average, companion dog, especially given each companion dog’s ontogeny -- their individual life experiences and personal development?

  • What are the sensibilities of companion dog living in the home? Are they diminished or enhanced by living in a home surrounded by humans as opposed to living on the streets?

  • And how do dogs see, smell and think about the world? Biology and psychology both greatly inform what we know and are learning about dogs.

I gave a run down of the entire conference topics and scientific presenters here. Today is the final day, and below are today's talks on Dog Cognition and Development. Check Facebook and Twitter for exact times.

Sunday, June 30 Talks. 9:00am - 5:00pm Pacific Standard Time (PST)

  • Michael W. Fox: Brain & Behavioral Development, Socialization & Superdogs

  • Clive Wynne: Dog Smarts: Their Nature and Function

  • Ádám Miklósi: Why dogs could not lose what they never had

  • Monique Udell: The Mind of the ‘Average’ Dog: Are we barking up the wrong tree?

  • Alexandra Horowitz: The Dog’s Point of View

5:00pm - 6:00pm Group Panel Discussion (PST)

  • Ray Coppinger, Michael W. Fox, Alexandra Horowitz, Kathryn Lord, Monique Udell, Clive Wynne Moderated by James K. Russell

You’ll find vibrant twitter discussions at #SPARCS2013, and you can even submit questions to a panel discussion at the conference. Of course, if you miss any of the programming, a DVD will be available later so check back with the SPARCS organizers.

If someone asks you what you did today, and you say you learned about dog behavior and cognition, now you will be able to explain when someone responds with a cocked head and sideways smile.

SPARCS Free Live Stream

#SPARCS2013 on Twitter and @CanineScience

SPARCS on Facebook

Image: Treat? By Nick Aldwin via Flicker and Creative Commons

Subscribe to Support Independent Journalism

Great science journalism requires human expertise, time, effort and creativity. And it costs money. That’s why I and the journalists here at Scientific American hope you’ll join our community.

When you subscribe, you are supporting staff and freelance journalists who are passionate about telling science stories that are true, important and compelling. Our editors and reporters are often experts in their fields, which means they understand the nuances of big discoveries and can untangle the breakthroughs from the hype. With a subscription, you are also supporting rigorous fact-checking to ensure the words we publish are precise and accurate. And you’re supporting original illustrations, graphics and photos that bring you closer to an advanced laboratory, an ice sheet in Antarctica or a space mission in orbit. You’re helping us craft other types of high-quality journalism as well: Our newsletters are carefully written, edited and curated by staffers you have or will come to know and love. Our Science Quickly podcast is based on original reporting, collaboration with editors and scientists and exacting production.

Subscriptions keep this engine running so we can continue to deliver thoughtful, rigorous and independent science journalism to you. In an era of viral misinformation, this work is crucial. If you value what we do, I hope you’ll consider joining us as a subscriber

Thank you,

Jeanna Bryner, Editor in Chief, Scientific American

Subscribe