Woman's Best Friend

Compared to many other species, dogs as a whole are relatively privileged. Most of us don’t eat them, nor do we specifically breed them to be eaten.

Join Our Community of Science Lovers!

This article was published in Scientific American’s former blog network and reflects the views of the author, not necessarily those of Scientific American


 

 

 


On supporting science journalism

If you're enjoying this article, consider supporting our award-winning journalism by subscribing. By purchasing a subscription you are helping to ensure the future of impactful stories about the discoveries and ideas shaping our world today.


Compared to many other species, dogs as a whole are relatively privileged. Most of us don’t eat them, nor do we specifically breed them to be eaten. They are more likely to receive vet care than other companion animals, and we spend more money on dogs than, say, cats (although whether the things we’re buying dogs are necessary or in their best interest is another conversation). And we're often trying to get at who dogs are—most recently, dogs' “personhood” was proposed by Gregory Burns (here), and was subsequently explored by Hal Herzog (here), Jason Goldman (here) and Patricia McConnell (here).

 

But the main reason I suggest that dogs are “privileged” is because they are being examined at all, in their own right, and not as a stand-in for something or someone else.

We often need to “see it to believe it,” and that’s the direction dogs are headed. Researchers around the world are chipping away at every angle of what dogs "see, smell and know," to borrow from a recent publication. The "assumed dog" is fading away.

My colleagues in the “Examined Dog” field include men, women and dogs (we couldn’t do squat without the dogs!). On Ada Lovelace Day—a day to recognize and champion women in science—I would like to highlight a few (of the many!) women investigating dogs in varied and meaningful ways.

Thank you for your hard work and inspirational contributions!

Dr. Pauleen Bennett, Australia

anthrozoology

Dr. Nancy Dreschel, USA

physiology and dog welfare

Dr. Dorit Feddersen-Petersen, Germany

dog social behavior

Dr. Márta Gácsi, Hungary

dog social cognition

Dr. Alexandra Horowitz, USA

dog umwelt and testing anthropomorphisms

Dr. Sarah Marshall-Pescini, Italy

dog social cognition

Dr. Patricia McConnell, USA

interspecific acoustic communication and applied ethology

Dr. Katherine Miller, USA

shelter welfare and dog rehabilitation

Dr. Cindy Otto, USA

working dog welfare

Dr. Daniela Ramos, Brazil

dog word learning and clinical ethology

Dr. Nicola Rooney, UK

social signalling and dog quality of life

Dr. Monique Udell, USA

interspecific social behavior

Dr. Zsófia Virányi, Austria and Hungary

interspecific social behavior and inferential abilities

And many more!

-----

Photo: Flickr 'girl on a wall' by Zoetnet via Creative commons.

 

 

It’s Time to Stand Up for Science

If you enjoyed this article, I’d like to ask for your support. Scientific American has served as an advocate for science and industry for 180 years, and right now may be the most critical moment in that two-century history.

I’ve been a Scientific American subscriber since I was 12 years old, and it helped shape the way I look at the world. SciAm always educates and delights me, and inspires a sense of awe for our vast, beautiful universe. I hope it does that for you, too.

If you subscribe to Scientific American, you help ensure that our coverage is centered on meaningful research and discovery; that we have the resources to report on the decisions that threaten labs across the U.S.; and that we support both budding and working scientists at a time when the value of science itself too often goes unrecognized.

In return, you get essential news, captivating podcasts, brilliant infographics, can't-miss newsletters, must-watch videos, challenging games, and the science world's best writing and reporting. You can even gift someone a subscription.

There has never been a more important time for us to stand up and show why science matters. I hope you’ll support us in that mission.

Thank you,

David M. Ewalt, Editor in Chief, Scientific American

Subscribe