Kermadec Trench: Like pieces of a jigsaw puzzle

Join Our Community of Science Lovers!

This article was published in Scientific American’s former blog network and reflects the views of the author, not necessarily those of Scientific American


Today saw retrieval of the two landers and fish trap from depths of 5000-5500m. This is still on the abyssal plain between the Kermadec Ridge and Kermadec Trench, but is starting to become a steeper slope as depths drop away towards the Trench. The hadal lander was the first aboard, and with it came video footage of a rough and rocky seafloor. Unfortunately the camera power failed after just two hours, and in that time very few fish were seen. The abyssal lander however, worked well and showed rattails, cusk eels, and large penaid shrimps-although none appeared abundant. The fish trap caught only a single fish, but there was no disappointment as it was another new record for the New Zealand region, believed to be Coryphaenoides yaquinae. There was also a good catch of amphipods.

The specimens of Coryphaenoides armatus from yesterday and Coryphaenoides yaquinae today are helping to piece together our understanding of the distribution of deep-sea fishes. Although C. armatus was known to occur, the specimens have confirmed it is relatively abundant in deep New Zealand areas (based on camera work). C. yaquinae is known from the North Pacific, (including the Japan and Mariana Trenches) and off Chile and Peru. But this is the first record in the Southwest Pacific, and proves a widespread Pacific rim distribution. For all of us onboard these are exciting results.

Amphipods haven’t featured much in the reports to date. But we are now approaching depths where things get interesting. The main species we have seen so far is Eurythenes gryllus, a worldwide species, and the second largest only to the “supergiant” Alicella. There was a good catch today, but we expect numbers to decrease as we go deeper onto the Trench. While in other trench systems Eurythenes is found as deep as 7000m, in the Kermadec Trench it hasn’t been found past 6000m, where we see other amphipod species dominate. We don’t know why, although one possibility being studied on this trip through genetic studies is the possibility that there is more than one species with different depth ranges, but they look the same-so-called “cryptic” species.


On supporting science journalism

If you're enjoying this article, consider supporting our award-winning journalism by subscribing. By purchasing a subscription you are helping to ensure the future of impactful stories about the discoveries and ideas shaping our world today.


This afternoon we deployed the gear at around 6000m, and if the weather holds we hope to go deeper still the following day - into the Trench proper - to improve our knowledge of how faunal communities change in the deep.

Previously in this series:

Kermadec Trench: Cook, Kermadec and Kaharoa

Previous research in the Kermadec Trench

Kermadec Trench: Scuttling your Assets

Kermadec Trench: Boring eels

Kermadec Trench: The Cosmopolitan Rattail

Kermadec Trench: The deep-water womble

Dr. Malcolm Clark is a Principal Scientist (Deepwater Fisheries) at the National Institute of Water and Atmospheric Research (NIWA) in Wellington, New Zealand. He is specialized in deep-sea fish and fisheries, seamount ecology, and the impacts of human activities. Dr. Clark was a lead principal investigator for the Census of Marine Life program on Seamounts (2005-11), and currently heads NIWA research programs on the biology and ecology of deep-sea communities (including seamount, hydrothermal vent, canyon and trench habitats).

More by Malcolm Clark

It’s Time to Stand Up for Science

If you enjoyed this article, I’d like to ask for your support. Scientific American has served as an advocate for science and industry for 180 years, and right now may be the most critical moment in that two-century history.

I’ve been a Scientific American subscriber since I was 12 years old, and it helped shape the way I look at the world. SciAm always educates and delights me, and inspires a sense of awe for our vast, beautiful universe. I hope it does that for you, too.

If you subscribe to Scientific American, you help ensure that our coverage is centered on meaningful research and discovery; that we have the resources to report on the decisions that threaten labs across the U.S.; and that we support both budding and working scientists at a time when the value of science itself too often goes unrecognized.

In return, you get essential news, captivating podcasts, brilliant infographics, can't-miss newsletters, must-watch videos, challenging games, and the science world's best writing and reporting. You can even gift someone a subscription.

There has never been a more important time for us to stand up and show why science matters. I hope you’ll support us in that mission.

Thank you,

David M. Ewalt, Editor in Chief, Scientific American

Subscribe