2015: Deadliest Year Ever for Rhinos

Poaching dropped slightly in South Africa but rose in other countries

southern white rhino

Photo: Bob Rayner. Used under Creative Commons license

Join Our Community of Science Lovers!

This article was published in Scientific American’s former blog network and reflects the views of the author, not necessarily those of Scientific American


Poachers killed at least 1,305 rhinos in Africa in 2015, the highest number in decades, according to reports released this week.

South Africa, the country that holds the vast majority of the world’s rhinos, lost at least 1,175 rhinos last year, according to official numbers released by Minister of Environmental Affairs Edna Molewa on Jan. 21. That’s down slightly from the record high in 2014, when 1,215 rhinos were killed.


On supporting science journalism

If you're enjoying this article, consider supporting our award-winning journalism by subscribing. By purchasing a subscription you are helping to ensure the future of impactful stories about the discoveries and ideas shaping our world today.


However, poaching levels went up in two other countries. Namibia lost 80 rhinos (up from 24) while “at least 50” were killed in Zimbabwe (up from just 12), according to numbers compiled by TRAFFIC, the wildlife trade monitoring network.

Kenya has not yet reported its rhino poaching statistics for 2015, although the number is expected to be lower than last year. The country lost 24 rhinos in 2014, according to the website Poaching Facts.

None of these counts break down the losses by species—Africa is home to both the white rhinoceros (Ceratotherium simum) and the black rhinoceros (Diceros bicornis)—nor do they include the various species of Asian rhinos. India, home to the biggest population of Indian or greater one-horned rhinoceros (Rhinoceros unicornis), lost as many as a few dozen animals to poachers in 2015.

It’s also possible that the official numbers don’t accurately count all of the dead rhinos. Experts have often criticized South Africa’s poaching statistics, saying they don’t count every dead rhino. The organization Outraged South African Citizens Against Rhino Poaching argues that poaching numbers should also include any young rhinos that die due to starvation or predation after their mothers are poached.

What is clear, however, is that enforcement is improving. South Africa arrested 317 poachers in 2015, up from 258 in 2014. Many other poachers were also killed by park rangers.

Of course, poachers also murdered quite a few people in return.

The next year is likely to present several critical opportunities to curtain rhino poaching. Last week’s meeting of the Convention on International Trade in Endangered Species of Wild Fauna and Flora (CITES) resulted in several key rhino conservation measures, with several nations agreeing to improve their regulations and collaborate on criminal investigations. Meanwhile Vietnam, one of the major consumers of rhino horn, also received strict instructions to improve its enforcement and reduce consumer demand for the illegal products.

On the other hand, this week the South African high court paved the way to restart the legal trade in rhino horns within the country, a move conservationists say could inspire further poaching and illegal international trade. Obviously, that’s a development that everyone will be watching as the year progresses and as rhino poaching numbers for 2016 start to climb.

Previously in Extinction Countdown:

John R. Platt is the editor of The Revelator. An award-winning environmental journalist, his work has appeared in Scientific American, Audubon, Motherboard, and numerous other magazines and publications. His "Extinction Countdown" column has run continuously since 2004 and has covered news and science related to more than 1,000 endangered species. John lives on the outskirts of Portland, Ore., where he finds himself surrounded by animals and cartoonists.

More by John R. Platt

It’s Time to Stand Up for Science

If you enjoyed this article, I’d like to ask for your support. Scientific American has served as an advocate for science and industry for 180 years, and right now may be the most critical moment in that two-century history.

I’ve been a Scientific American subscriber since I was 12 years old, and it helped shape the way I look at the world. SciAm always educates and delights me, and inspires a sense of awe for our vast, beautiful universe. I hope it does that for you, too.

If you subscribe to Scientific American, you help ensure that our coverage is centered on meaningful research and discovery; that we have the resources to report on the decisions that threaten labs across the U.S.; and that we support both budding and working scientists at a time when the value of science itself too often goes unrecognized.

In return, you get essential news, captivating podcasts, brilliant infographics, can't-miss newsletters, must-watch videos, challenging games, and the science world's best writing and reporting. You can even gift someone a subscription.

There has never been a more important time for us to stand up and show why science matters. I hope you’ll support us in that mission.

Thank you,

David M. Ewalt, Editor in Chief, Scientific American

Subscribe