A Record 1,215 Rhinos Were Poached in 2014

South Africa has finally finished compiling its report on the number of rhinos poached in the country last year and, as expected, the news is terrible.

Join Our Community of Science Lovers!

This article was published in Scientific American’s former blog network and reflects the views of the author, not necessarily those of Scientific American


South Africa has finally finished compiling its report on the number of rhinos poached in the country last year and, as expected, the news is terrible. All-told, 1,215 rhinos were killed by poachers in South Africa in 2014, the highest number ever and an increase of 21 percent over 2013.

By comparison, just 13 rhinos were killed by poachers in 2007. The poaching crisis began the next year and took off in 2010 as more and more of the horns were bound for Asia, where they are used in traditional medicine and as a hangover cure.

The vast majority of last year’s poaching deaths—827—occurred in Kruger National Park, which also holds the majority of South Africa’s rhinos. Unfortunately, the park borders Mozambique and poachers from that country traveled in and out of the reserve with near-impunity. In addition, several Kruger rangers were arrested in the past year and charged with aiding and abetting the poachers.


On supporting science journalism

If you're enjoying this article, consider supporting our award-winning journalism by subscribing. By purchasing a subscription you are helping to ensure the future of impactful stories about the discoveries and ideas shaping our world today.


Although poaching increased throughout South Africa, so did arrests, which went up to 386 from 343 in 2013. Arrests in Kruger National Park were up from 133 to 174.

South Africa is home to approximately 80 percent of the world’s rhinos, but it is not the only place where rhinos are poached. Outside of South Africa, rhino poaching also took place in several other African and Asian countries. Most notable, 27 rhinos were killed last year in India’s Kaziranga National Park, which recently put out a list of 323 wanted poachers. Namibia lost at least 24 rhinos last year. The deaths affect almost all rhino species, including the black and white rhinos of Africa and the greater one-horned rhinos of India. Only the Sumatran and Javan rhinos of Indonesia appear to have escaped poachers last year. Of course, there are only about 100 and 35 individuals remain from those two species, respectively, so that’s not much of a victory.

Many conservation groups warn that the next decade will be critical for all rhino species. Sumatran and Javan rhinos exist on the brink of extinction. Africa’s rhinos, meanwhile, now lose more rhinos to poachers than they make up with breeding.

Although a new year is now upon us, the deaths are far from over. As of press time, 49 rhinos have already been poached in South Africa in 2015. If last year was any indication, we can expect that number to climb to at least 100 by the end of the month.

Photo: A rhino in Kruger National Park by Russ Huggett. Used under Creative Commons license

Previously in Extinction Countdown:

Elsewhere in Scientific American:

John R. Platt is the editor of The Revelator. An award-winning environmental journalist, his work has appeared in Scientific American, Audubon, Motherboard, and numerous other magazines and publications. His "Extinction Countdown" column has run continuously since 2004 and has covered news and science related to more than 1,000 endangered species. John lives on the outskirts of Portland, Ore., where he finds himself surrounded by animals and cartoonists.

More by John R. Platt

It’s Time to Stand Up for Science

If you enjoyed this article, I’d like to ask for your support. Scientific American has served as an advocate for science and industry for 180 years, and right now may be the most critical moment in that two-century history.

I’ve been a Scientific American subscriber since I was 12 years old, and it helped shape the way I look at the world. SciAm always educates and delights me, and inspires a sense of awe for our vast, beautiful universe. I hope it does that for you, too.

If you subscribe to Scientific American, you help ensure that our coverage is centered on meaningful research and discovery; that we have the resources to report on the decisions that threaten labs across the U.S.; and that we support both budding and working scientists at a time when the value of science itself too often goes unrecognized.

In return, you get essential news, captivating podcasts, brilliant infographics, can't-miss newsletters, must-watch videos, challenging games, and the science world's best writing and reporting. You can even gift someone a subscription.

There has never been a more important time for us to stand up and show why science matters. I hope you’ll support us in that mission.

Thank you,

David M. Ewalt, Editor in Chief, Scientific American

Subscribe